Literature DB >> 15362928

Pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension.

Luca Degli Esposti1, Giorgia Valpiani.   

Abstract

Many studies have shown the importance of antihypertensive drug therapy as a factor in reducing the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and in containing the cost of managing hypertension and its complications. Nevertheless, the evidence in clinical practice indicates about half of hypertensive patients do not receive pharmacological treatment and about half of treated patients do not achieve blood pressure level control. Undertreating hypertension is the leading cause of failure in drug therapy effectiveness and cost effectiveness. The pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension can be defined as the clinical (number of cardiovascular events) and economic (costs of managing cardiovascular events) consequences that would have been avoided by adequate control of blood pressure levels. In the last few years, the increase in this burden and the restriction of budget constraints has raised the awareness of healthcare providers with regards to the need to achieve better performance and to improve disease management of hypertension. This review aims to present the current situation regarding the pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension by identifying the key issues of this medical condition, defining and measuring the extent of undertreatment, defining and measuring costs associated with undertreatment, and discussing some fundamental aspects of disease management for hypertension. The pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension appears to be an extremely important phenomenon for which there is currently only very limited adequate research. The present dearth of appropriate data can be largely attributed to the lack of epidemiological studies in clinical practice. Future studies are necessary for a more precise quantification of the therapeutic and economic impact of undertreating arterial hypertension in clinical practice (appropriateness studies) and for more precise selection of antihypertensive drugs on the basis of the different cost-effectiveness profiles detected in 'real world' settings (cost-effectiveness studies).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362928     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422140-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  94 in total

1.  Evidence based policy: proceed with care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

Review 2.  Cost effective analyses in the treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors:  A Fletcher
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  "Cost containment" in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  M Moser
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Trends in hypertension prevalence and management in Southwestern France, 1985-1996.

Authors:  P Marques-Vidal; J B Ruidavets; J P Cambou; J Ferrières
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Risk assessment and treatment benefit in intensively treated hypertensive patients of the hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study.

Authors:  A Zanchetti; L Hansson; J Ménard; G Leonetti; K H Rahn; I Warnold; H Wedel
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 7.  Health and disease management: what is it and where is it going? What is the role of health and disease management in hypertension?

Authors:  D B Bernard; R R Townsend; M F Sylvestri
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 8.  Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks. US population data.

Authors:  J Stamler; R Stamler; J D Neaton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-08

Review 9.  Epidemiology of hypertension.

Authors:  P K Whelton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Treatment of hypertension and ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  G Mancia
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.105

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Improving Adherence to Treatment and Reducing Economic Costs of Hypertension: The Role of Olmesartan-Based Treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Vittorio Costa
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-07-10

Review 2.  Economic benefits of treating high-risk hypertension with angiotensin II receptor antagonists (blockers).

Authors:  Antonio Coca
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Antihypertensive therapy among newly treated patients: An analysis of adherence and cost of treatment over years.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Stefania Saragoni; Paolo Batacchi; Pierangelo Geppetti; Stefano Buda; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-07-28

4.  Adherence to antihypertensive medications and health outcomes among newly treated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Stefania Saragoni; Silvia Benemei; Paolo Batacchi; Pierangelo Geppetti; Mauro Di Bari; Niccolò Marchionni; Alessandra Sturani; Stefano Buda; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-03-07

5.  An economic evaluation of antihypertensive therapies based on clinical trials.

Authors:  Rosana Lima Garcia Tsuji; Giovanio Vieira da Silva; Katia Coelho Ortega; Otavio Berwanger; Decio Mion Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Health expenditure comparison of extended-release metoprolol succinate and immediate-release metoprolol tartarate.

Authors:  Varun Vaidya; Pranav Patel
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-02-07

7.  Aliskiren in hypertension: evidence for its potential therapeutic value.

Authors:  Doris Peter
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2005-03-31

8.  Drug adherence to olmesartan/amlodipine fixed combination in an Italian clinical practice setting.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Stefania Saragoni; Stefano Buda; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-04-22

9.  Prescribing Data in General Practice Demonstration (PDGPD) project--a cluster randomised controlled trial of a quality improvement intervention to achieve better prescribing for chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Margaret Williamson; Magnolia Cardona-Morrell; Jeffrey D Elliott; James F Reeve; Nigel P Stocks; Jon Emery; Judith M Mackson; Jane M Gunn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Antihypertensive medication prescription patterns and time trends for newly-diagnosed uncomplicated hypertension patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Pang-Hsiang Liu; Jung-Der Wang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.