Literature DB >> 11062597

Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.

R S Chen1, P Lapuerta.   

Abstract

The use of pharmacoeconomic analyses to evaluate the appropriateness of treatment regimens is increasing rapidly. Trials that study the efficacy of antihypertensive agents do not often measure long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, so complementary methods are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these agents. One method is to compare agents on the basis of their costs and blood pressure-lowering efficacy, producing a ratio of cost per millimeter of mercury lowering, or cost/mm Hg. This provides a simple, transparent method with which to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive agents. It also allows the cost-effectiveness of a blood pressure treatment to be assessed in terms of ambulatory blood pressure data. The use of cost/mm Hg requires assumptions that tolerability of agents is comparable and that blood pressure lowering is a valid surrogate for cardiovascular risk reduction. Given the emergence of new treatments that have differences in blood pressure efficacy, cost/mm Hg is likely to become increasingly used as an indicator of economic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11062597     DOI: 10.1007/s11906-996-0036-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep        ISSN: 1522-6417            Impact factor:   5.369


  36 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness calculations from trials.

Authors:  E Ambrosioni; F V Costa
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1996-09

2.  Comparative efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and losartan in mild-to-moderate hypertension. Irbesartan/Losartan Study Investigators.

Authors:  K Kassler-Taub; T Littlejohn; W Elliott; T Ruddy; E Adler
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Hypertension control, 1994.

Authors:  S Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Expected gains in life expectancy from various coronary heart disease risk factor modifications.

Authors:  J Tsevat; M C Weinstein; L W Williams; A N Tosteson; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J T Edelson; M C Weinstein; A N Tosteson; L Williams; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Differences between amlodipine and lisinopril in control of clinic and twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  A R Lorimer; D Lyons; G Fowler; J C Petrie; M T Rothman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  D Perloff; M Sokolow; R Cowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost-effectiveness of felodipine-metoprolol (Logimax) and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  F Andersson; B Kartman; O K Andersson
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.749

View more
  2 in total

1.  An economic evaluation of antihypertensive therapies based on clinical trials.

Authors:  Rosana Lima Garcia Tsuji; Giovanio Vieira da Silva; Katia Coelho Ortega; Otavio Berwanger; Decio Mion Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 2.  The economic impact of hypertension.

Authors:  William J Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.