Literature DB >> 2113893

Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organizations.

M C Weinstein1.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a method of economic evaluation that can be used to assess the efficiency with which health care technologies use limited resources to produce health outputs. However, inconsistencies in the way that such ratios are constructed often lead to misleading conclusions when CEAs are compared. Some of these inconsistencies, such as failure to discount or to calculate incremental ratios correctly, reflect analytical errors that, if corrected, would resolve the inconsistencies. Others reflect fundamental differences in the viewpoint of the analysis. The perspectives of different decision-making entities can properly lead to different items in the numerator and denominator of the cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratio. Producers and consumers of CEA need to be more conscious of the perspectives of analysis, so that C/E comparisons from a given perspective are based upon a common understanding of the elements that are properly included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2113893     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300008953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  29 in total

1.  Quality assessment of economic evaluations published in PharmacoEconomics. The first four years (1992 to 1995).

Authors:  M Iskedjian; K Trakas; C A Bradley; A Addis; K Lanctôt; D Kruk; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Theoretical arguments for the discounting of health consequences: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Angelina Lazaro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The Australian Guidelines for subsidisation of pharmaceuticals: the road to cost-effective drug prescribing?

Authors:  M Johannesson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  G Karlsson; M Johannesson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Canadian guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Canadian Collaborative Workshop for Pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D Blaker; A Detsky; W Kennedy; F Schubert; D Menon; P Tugwell; R Konchak; E Hubbard; T Firestone
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Costs of illness in cost-effectiveness analysis. A review of the methodology.

Authors:  T A Hodgson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Modelling downstream effects in the presence of technological change.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.