Literature DB >> 3548611

Imipenem (N-F-thienamycin) versus netilmicin plus clindamycin. A controlled and randomized comparison in intra-abdominal infections.

H R Gonzenbach, H P Simmen, R Amgwerd.   

Abstract

In a randomized study the clinical and bacteriologic effectiveness of imipenem was compared with the classical combination of netilmicin with clindamycin in patients who had surgery for an intraperitoneal infection, localized or generalized, with positive bacteriologic findings of the specimen taken at surgery. Excluded were all patients who received other antibiotics before surgery, or who died within 3 days after antibiotic therapy was started. Imipenem was given at a dose of 500 mg t.i.d., clindamycin 600 mg t.i.d., and netilmicin according to serum levels. The diagnoses ranged from postoperative peritonitis, gallbladder empyema, perforated gastroduodenal ulcer, small bowel perforation with and without obstruction, and perforated appendicitis to perforation of the colon. The bacteriologic work-up included examination of the primary specimen (aerobic and anaerobic), the urine, feces, and serologic testing for Candida albicans once or twice a week and after the course of antibiotic therapy. In addition, pH measurements of abscesses and drainage fluids were performed. Ninety-three patients entered the study. Forty-seven patients were treated with imipenem (test group), and 46 patients were treated with the combination therapy (control group). The two groups did not show significant differences in age, sex, diagnostic groups, risk factors, primary bacteriology, and duration of therapy (mean: 6.7 days). Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) treated with imipenem were cured, six patients (12.8%) were improved, and there were three (6.4%) failures. The respective numbers for the control group were 31 (67.4%), 10 (21.7%), and 5 (10.9%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 19 days for the test group and 24.5 days for the control group. There were four wound infections in the test group and 11 wound infections in the control group. Imipenem is at least as effective in the adjuvant therapy of intra-abdominal infections as the combination of netilmicin with clindamycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3548611      PMCID: PMC1492722          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198703000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Empirical use of imipenem as the sole antibiotic in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  E H Freimer; H Donabedian; R Raeder; B S Ribner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Antibiotic trials in intra-abdominal infections. A critical evaluation of study design and outcome reporting.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; J L Meakins; M D Allo; E P Dellinger; R L Simmons
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Urinary recovery of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) as affected by coadministration of N-formimidoyl thienamycin dehydropeptidase inhibitors.

Authors:  S R Norrby; K Alestig; B Björnegård; L A Burman; F Ferber; J L Huber; K H Jones; F M Kahan; J S Kahan; H Kropp; M A Meisinger; J G Sundelof
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic species and its beta-lactamase stability.

Authors:  H C Neu; P Labthavikul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Imipenem versus moxalactam in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  L J Eron; D L Hixon; C H Park; R I Goldenberg; D M Poretz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Thienamycin: development of imipenen-cilastatin.

Authors:  F M Kahan; H Kropp; J G Sundelof; J Birnbaum
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  MK0787 (N-formimidoyl thienamycin): evaluation of in vitro and in vivo activities.

Authors:  H Kropp; J G Sundelof; J S Kahan; F M Kahan; J Birnbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787).

Authors:  F P Tally; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Metabolism of thienamycin and related carbapenem antibiotics by the renal dipeptidase, dehydropeptidase.

Authors:  H Kropp; J G Sundelof; R Hajdu; F M Kahan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  [Moxalactam - a beta-lactam antibiotic in the monotherapy of severe infections in surgery. Clinico-bacteriological study of 35 patients].

Authors:  H R Gonzenbach; W Sonnabend
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1981-08-04
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 3.  Imipenem/cilastatin: a pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  P Benfield; P Chrisp
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A prospective randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal and pelvic infections.

Authors:  L A Mandell; P L Turgeon; A R Ronalds
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-09

Review 5.  Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.

Authors:  S L Gorbach
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  D J Walters; J S Solomkin; J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  The treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections: the role of piperacillin/tazobactam.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; A S Malmborg; G Tunevall; B Wretlind; L Bergman; L O Mentzing; P O Nyström; E Kihlström; B Bäckstrand; T Skau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Optimal Treatment for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Metronidazole.

Authors:  Hiroshige Mikamo; Akira Yuasa; Keiko Wada; Bruce Crawford; Naomi Sugimoto
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.835

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.