Literature DB >> 3277587

Prospective study comparing imipenem-cilastatin with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.

A W Hackford1, F P Tally, R B Reinhold, M Barza, S L Gorbach.   

Abstract

Surgical infection remains a leading cause of hospital morbidity and mortality. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of imipenem-cilastatin sodium in 32 patients with that of clindamycin phosphate and gentamicin sulfate in 25 patients. In the imipenem-cilastatin group, 87.5% had a favorable outcome, with a 12.5% failure rate and 13 adverse reactions. In the clindamycin-gentamicin group, 80% had a favorable outcome, with a 20% failure rate and ten adverse reactions. Two significant superinfections with Pseudomonas and Candida were noted in patients treated with impenem-cilastatin. Each group had one case of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis. Cost analysis showed no differences between treatment arms, except in the appendicitis subgroup. For serious surgical infections, single-agent therapy with imipenem-cilastatin appears to be as efficacious as combination therapy with clindamycin and gentamicin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3277587     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400270056008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Imipenem/cilastatin: a pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  P Benfield; P Chrisp
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A prospective randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal and pelvic infections.

Authors:  L A Mandell; P L Turgeon; A R Ronalds
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-09

4.  Comparison of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  S M Cohn; P A Lipsett; T G Buchman; W G Cheadle; J W Milsom; S O'Marro; A E Yellin; S Jungerwirth; E V Rochefort; D C Haverstock; S F Kowalsky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.

Authors:  S L Gorbach
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  D J Walters; J S Solomkin; J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  The treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections: the role of piperacillin/tazobactam.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Horatio B Fung; Joanne Y Chang; Stephen Kuczynski
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; A S Malmborg; G Tunevall; B Wretlind; L Bergman; L O Mentzing; P O Nyström; E Kihlström; B Bäckstrand; T Skau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.