Literature DB >> 16082802

The visual search analogue of latent inhibition: implications for theories of irrelevant stimulus processing in normal and schizophrenic groups.

R E Lubow1, Oren Kaplan.   

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) is a robust phenomenon that is demonstrated when a previously inconsequential stimulus is less effective in a new learning situation than a novel stimulus. Despite LI's simplicity, there is considerable disagreement as to its theoretical basis. Attentional theories claim that unattended stimulus preexposures reduce stimulus associability. Alternatively, it has been asserted that associability is unaffected and that LI is a result of competition/retrieval processes. The present article reviews a series of visual search studies, some with normal subjects, both undifferentiated and divided into low and high schizotypals, and others with pathologies that entail dysfunctional attention, such as schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and anxiety. The visual search conditions were designed to model those of traditional LI experiments, while tapping attentional processes independently of the learning scores that index LI. A variety of evidence from these and other studies is used to support the involvement of attentional and retrieval processes in LI. A model of the mechanism of action of these processes in LI is presented, together with its application to schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082802     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  115 in total

1.  Latent inhibition in human adults without masking.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Francisco Arcediano; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Stress affects the selection of relevant from irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  H Braunstein-Bercovitz; I Dimentman-Ashkenazi; R E Lubow
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2001-06

3.  The effects of target and distractor familiarity on visual search in anxious children: latent inhibition and novel pop-out.

Authors:  R E Lubow; P Toren; N Laor; O Kaplan
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

4.  Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task.

Authors:  I Baruch; D R Hemsley; J A Gray
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  Latent inhibition and recall/recognition of irrelevant stimuli as a function of pre-exposure duration in high and low psychotic-prone normal subjects.

Authors:  L G De la Casa; G Ruiz; R E Lubow
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1993-02

6.  Modulation of latent inhibition in the rat by altered dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens at the time of conditioning.

Authors:  M H Joseph; S L Peters; P M Moran; G A Grigoryan; A M Young; J A Gray
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Dopamine agonists disrupt visual latent inhibition in normal males using a within-subject paradigm.

Authors:  Neal R Swerdlow; Nora Stephany; Lindsay C Wasserman; Jo Talledo; Richard Sharp; Pamela P Auerbach
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  R E Lubow; J C Gewirtz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Latent inhibition in drug naive schizophrenics: relationship to duration of illness and dopamine D2 binding using SPET.

Authors:  N S Gray; L S Pilowsky; J A Gray; R W Kerwin
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Retrieval variability: sources and consequences.

Authors:  R R Miller; W J Kasprow; T R Schachtman
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1986
View more
  9 in total

1.  Dissociating scopolamine-induced disrupted and persistent latent inhibition: stage-dependent effects of glycine and physostigmine.

Authors:  Segev Barak; Ina Weiner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of preexposure and retention interval placement on latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a choice-maze discrimination task.

Authors:  L G De La Casa; William Timberlake
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  There is a time and a place for everything: bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation.

Authors:  R E Lubow; L G De la Casa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

4.  Knockdown of Nurr1 in the rat hippocampus: implications to spatial discrimination learning and memory.

Authors:  Wanda I Colón-Cesario; Michelle M Martínez-Montemayor; Sohaira Morales; Jahaira Félix; Juan Cruz; Monique Adorno; Lixmar Pereira; Nydia Colón; Carmen S Maldonado-Vlaar; Sandra Peña de Ortiz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Reciprocal activation/inactivation of ERK in the amygdala and frontal cortex is correlated with the degree of novelty of an open-field environment.

Authors:  Frederico Velasco Sanguedo; Caio Vitor Bueno Dias; Flavia Regina Cruz Dias; Richard Ian Samuels; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  The neural underpinnings of associative learning in health and psychosis: how can performance be preserved when brain responses are abnormal?

Authors:  Graham K Murray; Philip R Corlett; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Functional networks underlying latent inhibition learning in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Frank Puga; Douglas W Barrett; Christel C Bastida; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Differential role of muscarinic transmission within the entorhinal cortex and basolateral amygdala in the processing of irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Segev Barak; Ina Weiner
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Human electrophysiological correlates of learned irrelevance: effects of the muscarinic M1 antagonist biperiden.

Authors:  Inge Klinkenberg; Arjan Blokland; Wim Riedel; Anke Sambeth
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.176

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.