Literature DB >> 7476240

Familiarity and attention: does what we know affect what we notice?

J Christie1, R Klein.   

Abstract

Previous work on the object and word superiority effects has demonstrated that activation from stored representations can facilitate identification of items in a visual display. We predicted that activation of this sort might exogenously attract visual attention toward items that have stored representations. To test this prediction, we presented a familiar (word) and an unfamiliar (nonword) item simultaneously at unpredictable locations, and after varying delays, moved one of the stimuli. In accord with our prediction, at the shortest intervals subjects were more efficient at discriminating motion of the familiar item. Control data demonstrated that this advantage was due to a competitive interaction and not to the familiarity of the items per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7476240     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; S A Hillyard; S J Luck; M Mouloua; C J Downing; D P Woodward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Attention capture by novel stimuli.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley; S H Plewe; J M Elliott; M J DeWitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-12

5.  Perception and retention of familiar and unfamiliar material.

Authors:  B Earhard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-04

6.  Search time in a redundant visual display.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-03

7.  How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings?

Authors:  J H Flowers; D J Lohr
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-06

8.  Familiarity, redundancy, and the spatial control of visual attention.

Authors:  J H Flowers; M L Polansky; S Kerl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  22 in total

1.  Attention is biased to near surfaces.

Authors:  Greg L West; Jay Pratt; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

2.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

3.  Words can slow down category learning.

Authors:  Chandra L Brojde; Chelsea Porter; Eliana Colunga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Orthographic and semantic processing in young readers.

Authors:  Lara R Polse; Judy S Reilly
Journal:  J Res Read       Date:  2015-02

5.  Ventral and dorsal visual stream contributions to the perception of object shape and object location.

Authors:  Valentinos Zachariou; Roberta Klatzky; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Common Dorsal Stream Substrates for the Mapping of Surface Texture to Object Parts and Visual Spatial Processing.

Authors:  Valentinos Zachariou; Christine V Nikas; Zaid N Safiullah; Marlene Behrmann; Roberta Klatzky; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Small number preference in guiding attention.

Authors:  Yong-Chun Cai; Shuang-Xia Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition.

Authors:  Henrike K Blumenfeld; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-07

9.  Incidental biasing of attention from visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Hold it! Memory affects attentional dwell time.

Authors:  Emily L Parks; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.