Literature DB >> 23631551

Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing.

Laura Batterink1, Helen Neville.   

Abstract

In contrast to native language acquisition, adult second-language (L2) acquisition occurs under highly variable learning conditions. Although most adults acquire their L2 at least partially through explicit instruction, as in a classroom setting, many others acquire their L2 primarily through implicit exposure, as is typical of an immersion environment. Whether these differences in acquisition environment play a role in determining the neural mechanisms that are ultimately recruited to process L2 grammar has not been well characterized. This study investigated this issue by comparing the ERP response to novel L2 syntactic rules acquired under conditions of implicit exposure and explicit instruction, using a novel laboratory language-learning paradigm. Native speakers tested on these stimuli showed a biphasic response to syntactic violations, consisting of an earlier negativity followed by a later P600 effect. After merely an hour of training, both implicitly and explicitly trained learners who were capable of detecting grammatical violations also elicited P600 effects. In contrast, learners who were unable to discriminate between grammatically correct and incorrect sentences did not show significant P600 effects. The magnitude of the P600 effect was found to correlate with learners' behavioral proficiency. Behavioral measures revealed that successful learners from both the implicit and explicit groups gained explicit, verbalizable knowledge about the L2 grammar rules. Taken together, these results indicate that late, controlled mechanisms indexed by the P600 play a crucial role in processing a late-learned L2 grammar, regardless of training condition. These findings underscore the remarkable plasticity of later, attention-dependent processes and their importance in lifelong learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23631551      PMCID: PMC4334462          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  47 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations.

Authors:  J Rüsseler; F Rösler
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

2.  The resolution of case conflicts from a neurophysiological perspective.

Authors:  Stefan Frisch; Matthias Schlesewsky
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-01

3.  Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners.

Authors:  Margaret Gillon Dowens; Marta Vergara; Horacio A Barber; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An event-related potential study on changes of violation and error responses during morphosyntactic learning.

Authors:  Douglas J Davidson; Peter Indefrey
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish - evidence from Event Related Potentials.

Authors:  Margaret Gillon Dowens; Taomei Guo; Jingjing Guo; Horacio Barber; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  M Eimer; T Goschke; F Schlaghecken; B Stürmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing.

Authors:  Eric Pakulak; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  One-year retention of general and sequence-specific skills in a probabilistic, serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Jennifer C Romano; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-04-20

10.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Karsten Steinhauer; Erdmut Pfeifer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Lexical processing deficits in children with developmental language disorder: An event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Sergey A Kornilov; James S Magnuson; Natalia Rakhlin; Nicole Landi; Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2015-05

2.  Native-language N400 and P600 predict dissociable language-learning abilities in adults.

Authors:  Zhenghan Qi; Sara D Beach; Amy S Finn; Jennifer Minas; Calvin Goetz; Brian Chan; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Katherine M Simeon; Hillary E Snyder; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning.

Authors:  Kinsey Bice; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Processing Aspectual Agreement in a Language with Limited Morphological Inflection by Second Language Learners: An ERP Study of Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yuxin Hao; Xun Duan; Qiuyue Yan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  ERPs recorded during early second language exposure predict syntactic learning.

Authors:  Laura Batterink; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.

Authors:  Anne L Beatty-Martínez; Michelle R Bruni; María Teresa Bajo; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.348

8.  Early neurophysiological indices of second language morphosyntax learning.

Authors:  Jeff Hanna; Yury Shtyrov; John Williams; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The Feedback-Related Negativity and the P300 Brain Potential Are Sensitive to Price Expectation Violations in a Virtual Shopping Task.

Authors:  Alexandre Schaefer; Luciano G Buratto; Nobuhiko Goto; Emilie V Brotherhood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rapid L2 Word Learning through High Constraint Sentence Context: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Baoguo Chen; Tengfei Ma; Lijuan Liang; Huanhuan Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.