Literature DB >> 10091078

The DICOM image formatting standard: its role in echocardiography and angiography.

J D Thomas1.   

Abstract

Both echocardiography and angiography have traditionally used analog media for long-term storage, but increasingly there is the desire to develop digital storage and exchange methodology. Before digital storage can become a reality, though, standards must be agreed to by the vendor and user community to ensure global intra operability of medical instrumentation. To this end, the National Electrical Manufacturers' Association and various professional organizations from around the world have collaborated to develop the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) image formatting standard. This standard specifies the exact way in which digital images are exchanged between instruments, either using a network or storage medium, and distinct standards have been developed for angiography and echocardiography. In angiography, only gray scale images are considered, whereas in echocardiography several different types of image formats are allowed to account for color Doppler echocardiography. Distinct standards have also evolved for disk-based storage. For angiography, only storage on the writable CD-ROM is allowed, whereas echocardiograms may be stored on re-writable magneto-optical disks, floppy disks, and CD-ROMs. Only lossless compression is allowed in the angiographic standard, whereas echocardiography allows the use of the JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) lossy compression algorithm. Currently, all major angiographic and echocardiographic vendors have agreed to support the DICOM standard, and products are beginning to appear, first with disk-based storage but increasingly with network-based exchange of image data.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10091078     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006018614132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  10 in total

1.  JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality.

Authors:  T H Karson; S Chandra; A J Morehead; W J Stewart; S E Nissen; J D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  The DICOM Image Formatting Standard: what it means for echocardiographers.

Authors:  J D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Comparison of MPEG digital video with super VHS tape for diagnostic echocardiographic readings.

Authors:  J S Soble; G Yurow; R Brar; T Stamos; A Neumann; M Garcia; M F Stoddard; P K Cherian; B Bhamb; J D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 4.  Digital storage and transmission of cardiovascular images: what are the costs, benefits and timetable for conversion?

Authors:  J D Thomas; S E Nissen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study.

Authors:  T H Karson; R C Zepp; S Chandra; A Morehead; J D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 6.  Digital storage and retrieval: the future in echocardiography.

Authors:  J D Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Digital compression of echocardiograms: impact on quantitative interpretation of color Doppler velocity.

Authors:  J D Thomas; S Chandra; T H Karson; M Pu; P M Vandervoort
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Digital recording, display, and storage of echocardiograms.

Authors:  H Feigenbaum
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Digital formatting standards in medical imaging: a primer for echocardiographers.

Authors:  J D Thomas; B K Khandheria
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs.

Authors:  M A Goldberg; M Pivovarov; W W Mayo-Smith; M P Bhalla; J G Blickman; R T Bramson; G W Boland; H J Llewellyn; E Halpern
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.959

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Adjustment method for mechanical Boston scientific corporation 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound catheters connected to a Clearview console. Mechanical 30 MHz IVUS catheter adjustment.

Authors:  Nico Bruining; Ronald Hamers; Tat-Jin Teo; Pim J de Feijter; Patrick W Serruys; Jos R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Enterprise imaging and multi-departmental PACS.

Authors:  Björn Bergh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Implementation and Benefits of a Vendor-Neutral Archive and Enterprise-Imaging Management System in an Integrated Delivery Network.

Authors:  Chen Sirota-Cohen; Beverly Rosipko; Daniel Forsberg; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Age and gender related reference values for transthoracic Doppler-echocardiography in the anesthetized CD1 mouse.

Authors:  Jörg Stypmann; Markus A Engelen; Constanze Epping; Harold V M van Rijen; Peter Milberg; Christian Bruch; Günter Breithardt; Klaus Tiemann; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Publishing on the WWW. Part 9 - Video codecs and decompressors.

Authors:  V Grech
Journal:  Images Paediatr Cardiol       Date:  2003-10

6.  Evaluation of video compression methods for cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Hui Yan; Yexiong Li; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.