Literature DB >> 3272788

Digital recording, display, and storage of echocardiograms.

H Feigenbaum1.   

Abstract

Digital acquisition, display, and storage are new options available for handling echocardiographic images. These types of image management offer many practical advantages and are excellent supplements to standard videotape recordings. For routine M-mode and Doppler studies this digital approach, when combined with videotape, can virtually eliminate the necessity for strip chart recordings. Probably the principal advantage of digital storage techniques is for two-dimensional echocardiography. The continuous loop display is extremely convenient for rapid review, quantitation, and serial studies. When considering the implementation of these techniques, there are many limitations and practical considerations that must be kept in mind. Recording two-dimensional echocardiograms in a continuous loop mode requires that the same number of frames or cells must be used if one wants to display more than one image simultaneously. When creating a continuous loop of a single cardiac cycle, the number of cells and the interval between cells are greatly influenced by the heart rate. One must be able to display simultaneous images with varying heart rates. Last, the number of cells, the resolution, and the gray scale determine the amount of digital information that has to be stored, retrieved, or transmitted. The cost and size of the medium and the speed with which the images can be retrieved or transmitted become factors in how one elects to digitally acquire this information. One approach that has been used, which seems to work quite well in most cases, is to use an eight-cell sequence for two-dimensional echocardiograms. When primarily interested in looking at ventricular function, especially regional wall motion, a 50 msec interval between frames is most appropriate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3272788     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(88)80014-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  6 in total

Review 1.  The DICOM image formatting standard: its role in echocardiography and angiography.

Authors:  J D Thomas
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998

2.  The controversy regarding contrast echocardiography and how it affects patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel L Wagner; Julio E Pérez; Linda R Peterson; Ravi Rasalingam
Journal:  J Cardiometab Syndr       Date:  2008

3.  Late reopening of an occluded infarct related artery improves left ventricular function and long term clinical outcome.

Authors:  F Piscione; G Galasso; G De Luca; G Marrazzo; G Sarno; O Viola; D Accardo; M Chiariello
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Echocardiography and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  H Feigenbaum
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993

5.  Stress echocardiography: time for critical reappraisal.

Authors:  P K Mazeika; P Nihoyannopoulos; C M Oakley
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

Review 6.  A consideration of current clinical options for stress imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.