Literature DB >> 7640024

JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality.

T H Karson1, S Chandra, A J Morehead, W J Stewart, S E Nissen, J D Thomas.   

Abstract

Routine echocardiograms are not handled digitally because of enormous storage needs. Image compression techniques can reduce memory requirements, but the impact on diagnostic content is unknown. We studied the effect of an internationally accepted compression algorithm called Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) on digital echocardiographic images. Diagnostic and image quality of JPEG compressed, two-dimensional echocardiograms at ratios ranging from 4:1 to 40:1 was compared with that of uncompressed images both subjectively by a blinded expert panel (540 observations) and objectively by quantitative image-processing parameters (180 images). Accuracy of 432 measurements performed on compressed M-mode and spectral Doppler tracings was determined. Simultaneously acquired videotaped images and their never-compressed digital counterparts were compared quantitatively for image fidelity. This study demonstrates that the JPEG compression algorithm produces little degradation of echocardiographic images at compression ratios of at least 20:1, with less measured distortion than is produced by videotape recording. With JPEG, digital storage and retrieval in routine echocardiography are feasible.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7640024     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(05)80041-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  9 in total

1.  Wavelet compression on detection of brain lesions with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Terae; K Miyasaka; K Kudoh; T Nambu; T Shimizu; K Kaneko; H Yoshikawa; R Kishimoto; T Omatsu; N Fujita
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  The DICOM image formatting standard: its role in echocardiography and angiography.

Authors:  J D Thomas
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998

3.  A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.

Authors:  T A Iyriboz; M J Zukoski; K D Hopper; P L Stagg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Irreversible compression of medical images.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Update on new technologies in pediatric echocardiography.

Authors:  L I Bezold; M B Lewin; G W Vick; R Pignatelli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1997

6.  An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images.

Authors:  K Persons; P Palisson; A Manduca; B J Erickson; V Savcenko
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Digital storage and retrieval: the future in echocardiography.

Authors:  J D Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  "Evaluation of a very low-cost and simple teleradiology technique".

Authors:  Mahdieh Khodaie; Azam Askari; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Block selective redaction for minimizing loss during de-identification of burned in text in irreversibly compressed JPEG medical images.

Authors:  David A Clunie; Dan Gebow
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.