Literature DB >> 15068137

Adjustment method for mechanical Boston scientific corporation 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound catheters connected to a Clearview console. Mechanical 30 MHz IVUS catheter adjustment.

Nico Bruining1, Ronald Hamers, Tat-Jin Teo, Pim J de Feijter, Patrick W Serruys, Jos R T C Roelandt.   

Abstract

Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) is often used in studies evaluating new interventional techniques. It is important that quantitative measurements performed with various ICUS imaging equipment and materials are comparable. During evaluation of quantitative coronary ultrasound (QCU) software, it appeared that Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) 30 MHz catheters connected to a Clearview ultrasound console showed smaller dimensions of an in vitro phantom model than expected. In cooperation with the manufacturer the cause of this underestimation was determined, which is described in this paper, and the QCU software was extended with an adjustment. Evaluation was performed by performing in vitro measurements on a phantom model consisting of four highly accurate steel rings (perfect reflectors) with diameters of 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm. Relative differences (unadjusted) of the phantom were respectively: 15.92, 13.01, 10.10 and 12.23%. After applying the adjustment: -0.96, -1.84, -1.35 and -1.43%. In vivo measurements were performed on 24 randomly selected ICUS studies. These showed differences for not adjusted vs. adjusted measurements of lumen-, vessel- and plaque volumes of -10.1 +/- 1.5, -6.7 +/- 0.9 and -4.4 +/- 0.6%. An off-line adjustment formula was derived and applied on previous numerical QCU output data showing relative differences for lumen- and vessel volumes of 0.36 +/- 0.51 and 0.13 +/- 0.31%. 30 MHz BSC catheters connected to a Clearview ultrasound console underestimate vessel dimensions. This can retrospectively be adjusted within QCU software as well as retrospectively on numerical QCU data using a mathematical model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15068137     DOI: 10.1023/b:caim.0000014046.63648.1c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  19 in total

Review 1.  Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications.

Authors:  S E Nissen; P Yock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Quantitative measurements of in-stent restenosis: A comparison between quantitative coronary ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  N Bruining; M Sabate; P J de Feyter; I P Kay; J Ligthart; C Disco; M J Kutryk; J R Roelandt; P W Serruys
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of three different intravascular ultrasound catheter designs.

Authors:  S Fort; N A Freeman; P Johnston; E A Cohen; F S Foster
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Determining appropriate small vessels for stenting by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  T Okabe; Y Asakura; S Ishikawa; K Asakura; H Mitamura; S Ogawa
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.022

5.  Morphometric analysis in three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: an in vitro and in vivo study performed with a novel system for the contour detection of lumen and plaque.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; C Di Mario; W Li; J C Schuurbiers; C J Slager; P J de Feyter; J R Roelandt; P W Serruys
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound analysis: implications for volumetric measurements.

Authors:  N Bruining; C von Birgelen; P J de Feyter; J Ligthart; W Li; P W Serruys; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1998-03

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of coronary arteries. Is three layers the norm?

Authors:  P J Fitzgerald; F G St Goar; A J Connolly; F J Pinto; M E Billingham; R L Popp; P G Yock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Expansion of Wiktor stents by oversizing versus high-pressure dilatation: a randomized, intracoronary ultrasound-controlled study.

Authors:  A B Buchwald; G S Werner; K Möller; C Unterberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis.

Authors:  G R Dussaillant; G S Mintz; A D Pichard; K M Kent; L F Satler; J J Popma; S C Wong; M B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  6 in total

1.  The devil may be in the details...quantitative measurements in intravascular ultrasound images.

Authors:  Jouke Dijkstra; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Rationale and methods of the integrated biomarker and imaging study (IBIS): combining invasive and non-invasive imaging with biomarkers to detect subclinical atherosclerosis and assess coronary lesion biology.

Authors:  Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Nico Bruining; Johannes A Schaar; Eugene McFadden; Nico Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Frits Mastik; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Gaston A Rodriguez Granillo; Marco Valgimigli; Georgios Sianos; Willem J van der Giessen; Bianca Backx; Marie-Angele M Morel; Gerrit-Anne Van Es; Jonathon D Sawyer; June Kaplow; Andrew Zalewski; Anton F W van der Steen; Pim de Feyter; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Atherosclerosis imaging with intravascular ultrasound. Validating acquisition and measurement tools to assure meaningful results.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Dedicated calibration formulas permit correction of differences between measurements by different IVUS devices as demonstrated in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries in vitro.

Authors:  Marc Hartmann; Clemens von Birgelen; Gary S Mintz; Nadine Deppermann; Olaf Dirsch; Martin G Stoel; Gert K van Houwelingen; Hans W Louwerenburg; Patrick M J Verhorst; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Comparison between coronary plaque 64-slice spiral CT characteristics and risk factors of coronary artery disease patients in Chinese Han population and Mongolian.

Authors:  Zhigang Bai; Xiaoguang Yang; Xiaodong Han; Peide Dong; Aishi Liu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 6.  Mechanically Rotating Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Transducer: A Review.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Sung; Jin-Ho Chang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.