Literature DB >> 30218192

Small-incision cholecystectomy (through a cylinder retractor) under local anaesthesia and sedation: a prospective observational study of five hundred consecutive cases.

Enrique J Grau-Talens1,2, José Jacob Motos-Micó3,4, Rafael Giraldo-Rubio3,4, José M Aparicio-Gallego3,4, José F Salgado3,4, Carlos D Ibáñez3,4, Pablo G Mangione-Castro3,5, Martina Arribas-Jurado3,6, Carlos Jordán-Chaves3,7, Javier Arias-Díaz8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcylindrical cholecystectomy (TC) can be performed under local anaesthesia and sedation (LAS) in ambulatory surgery (AS). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and results of TC under LAS.
METHODS: TC under LAS was proposed to 583 consecutive patients with cholelithiasis in an AS unit. For the TC procedure, a cylindrical retractor with a transparent plunger was inserted into the hepatocystic triangle, and cholecystectomy was performed through the retractor with reusable open instruments. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were prospectively registered, including complications, reasons for conversion to general anaesthesia (GA), non-programmed admissions, readmissions, pain assessments, and satisfaction with the procedure.
RESULTS: Five hundred patients were eligible for LAS, with GA being required in 128 (25.6%) of them. AS was programmed for 447 patients. The rates of non-programmed admissions, readmissions, and conversion to laparotomy were 8.7% (39), 0.8% (4), and 2.6% (13), respectively. There was no main bile duct injury. At 24 h, physical status was good or excellent in 80.4% of the patients. A history of acute cholecystitis, male sex, a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 39.5 kg/m2, and non-suspected acute cholecystitis were found to be independent variables associated with conversion to GA.
CONCLUSIONS: TC under LAS is a safe procedure in AS and is feasible in 74% of cholelithiasis patients. Male sex, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness, and a history of acute cholecystitis are factors that increase the probability of conversion to GA. This prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of Badajoz for patient protection for biomedical research and has been retrospectively registered under the research registry UIN: researchregistry3979.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory surgery; Local anaesthesia; Transcylindrical cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30218192     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1707-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  32 in total

Review 1.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Hein G Gooszen; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Respiratory complications associated with tracheal intubation and extubation.

Authors:  T Asai; K Koga; R S Vaughan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Minicholecystectomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure.

Authors:  A K Seale; W P Ledet
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-03

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster.

Authors:  S J Savader; K D Lillemoe; C A Prescott; A B Winick; A C Venbrux; G B Lund; S E Mitchell; J L Cameron; F A Osterman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Discharge criteria--a new trend.

Authors:  F Chung
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Yunus Nadi Yuksek; Arif Zeki Akat; Ugur Gozalan; Gul Daglar; Yasar Pala; Mehmet Canturk; Tanju Tutuncu; Nuri Aydin Kama
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Tiwari; Ashutosh Chauhan; Pallab Chaterjee; Mohammed T Alam
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xian-Xue Wang; Quan Zhou; Dao-Bo Pan; Hui-Wei Deng; Ai-Guo Zhou; Hua-Jing Guo; Fu-Rong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Klein; Atakan Görkem Barutcu; Dino Kröll; Maik Kilian; Johann Pratschke; Roland Raakow; Jonas Raakow
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.445

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.