Literature DB >> 10087902

Press-fit acetabular cup fixation: principles and testing.

W Macdonald1, L V Carlsson, G J Charnley, C M Jacobsson.   

Abstract

Pre-clinical testing of the fixation of press-fit acetabular components of total hip prostheses relies on cadaver or synthetic bone, but the properties and geometry of bone models differ from those of physiological bone. Cup designs use varied mechanisms for initial stability in bone; therefore, using different analogues and tests is appropriate. Press-fit cup stability was tested in the following: firstly, polyurethane (PU) foam modelling cancellous support; secondly, glass-fibre reinforced epoxide (GFRE) tubes modelling acetabular cortical support; thirdly, cadaveric acetabula. Three commercial cups [Harris-Galante II (H-G-II), Zimmer; Optifix, Smith & Nephew, Richards; porous coated anatomic (PCA), Howmedica] and an experimental cup with enhanced rim fixation were tested in three modes: direct pull-out, lever-out and axial torque. The fixation stabilities measured in the PU and the GFRE models showed trends consistent with those in cadaver bone, differing in the oversizing and cup geometry. The experimental cup was significantly more secure in most modes than other cups; the H-G II and Optifix cups showed similar stabilities, lower than that of the experimental cup but greater than that of the PCA cup (analysis of variance and Tukey's highly significant test; p < 0.001). The stabilities measured in cadaver bone more closely approximated those in GFRE. The use of several bone analogues enables separation of fixation mechanisms, allowing more accurate prediction of in vivo performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10087902     DOI: 10.1243/0954411991534780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  10 in total

1.  [Influence of acetabular cup design on the primary implant stability : an experimental and numerical analysis].

Authors:  C Zietz; A Fritsche; D Kluess; W Mittelmeier; R Bader
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Assessing the Acetabular Cup Implant Primary Stability by Impact Analyses: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Adrien Michel; Romain Bosc; Jean-Paul Meningaud; Philippe Hernigou; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ex Vivo Evaluation of Cementless Acetabular Cup Stability Using Impact Analyses with a Hammer Instrumented with Strain Sensors.

Authors:  Antoine Tijou; Giuseppe Rosi; Philippe Hernigou; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Microindentation - a tool for measuring cortical bone stiffness? A systematic review.

Authors:  M Arnold; S Zhao; S Ma; F Giuliani; U Hansen; J P Cobb; R L Abel; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Computed tomography porosity and spherical indentation for determining cortical bone millimetre-scale mechanical properties.

Authors:  Oliver R Boughton; Shaocheng Ma; Xiran Cai; Liye Yan; Laura Peralta; Pascal Laugier; James Marrow; Finn Giuliani; Ulrich Hansen; Richard L Abel; Quentin Grimal; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Primary stability of two uncementedacetabular components of different geometry: hemispherical or peripherallyenhanced?

Authors:  G Antoniades; E J Smith; A H Deakin; S C Wearing; M Sarungi
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation.

Authors:  Oliver R Boughton; Shaocheng Ma; Sarah Zhao; Matthew Arnold; Angus Lewis; Ulrich Hansen; Justin P Cobb; Finn Giuliani; Richard L Abel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Two Different Methods to Measure the Stability of Acetabular Implants: A Comparison Using Artificial Acetabular Models.

Authors:  Quentin Goossens; Leonard Cezar Pastrav; Michiel Mulier; Wim Desmet; Jos Vander Sloten; Kathleen Denis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Effect of impaction energy on dynamic bone strains, fixation strength, and seating of cementless acetabular cups.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.