Literature DB >> 10087853

Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking.

B Xu1, C A Perfetti.   

Abstract

Three backward-masking experiments demonstrated that the magnitude of the phonemic mask reduction effect (MRE) is a function of subjective threshold and that the magnitude is also independent of stimulus-based response strategies. In all three experiments, a target word (e.g., bake) was backward masked by a graphemically similar nonword (e.g., BAWK), a phonemically similar nonword (e.g., BAIK), or an unrelated control (e.g., CRUG). Experiments 1 and 2 had a low percentage (9%) of trials with phonemic masks and differed only in baseline identification rate. Experiment 3 controlled baseline identification rate at below and above subjective threshold levels, with 9% phonemic trials. The results were that identification rates were higher with phonemic masks than with graphemic masks, irrespective of the low percentage of phonemic trials. However, the magnitude of the phonemic MRE became large only when the baseline identification rate was below subjective threshold. The pattern of the phonemic MRE was interpreted as a result of rapid automatic phonological activation, independent of stimulus-based processing strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10087853     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments.

Authors:  A M Jacobs; J Grainger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Reading isolated words: no evidence for automatic incorporation of the phonetic code.

Authors:  M Brysbaert; C Praet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

3.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

Authors:  J Grainger; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

5.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.

Authors:  J Cheesman; P M Merikle
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

6.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

7.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance.

Authors:  S Grossberg; G Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; J C Johnston; B L Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

10.  Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization.

Authors:  A D Fisk; W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: automatic after all.

Authors:  M Brysbaert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-07

2.  Silent letters and phonological priming.

Authors:  Chang H Lee; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-05

3.  The effect of phonological structure on visual word access in bilinguals.

Authors:  John Evar Strid; James Booth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.