Literature DB >> 10084183

Can intramedullary signal change on magnetic resonance imaging predict surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

E Wada1, K Yonenobu, S Suzuki, A Kanazawa, T Ochi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study evaluating magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomographic myelography, and clinical parameters in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging can predict the surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No previous studies have established whether areas of high signal intensity in T2-weighted magnetic resonance images can be a predictor of surgical outcomes.
METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were examined by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic myelography before surgery and by delayed computed tomographic myelography after surgery. The correlation between the recovery rate and the clinical and imaging parameters was analyzed.
RESULTS: The best prognostic factor was the transverse area of the spinal cord at maximum compression (correlation coefficient, R = 0.58). The presence of high signal intensity areas on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images correlated poorly with the recovery rate (R = -0.29). However, patients with multisegmental areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images tended to have poor surgical results associated with muscle atrophy in the upper extremities. Postoperative delayed computed tomographic myelography showed that multisegmental areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images probably represent cavitation in the central spinal cord.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multisegmental areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images tended to have poorer surgical results. However, the transverse area of the spinal cord at the level of maximum compression was a better prognostic indicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10084183     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199903010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  46 in total

1.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Predicted cervical canal enlargement and effective cord decompression following expansive laminoplasty using cervical magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohd Imran Yusof; Eskandar Hassan; Shafie Abdullah
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Setsuro Komiya; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: focusing on the quantitative signal intensity.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Fan Tao Meng; Shuai Wang; Lin Feng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis correlates with surgical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  L-Q Sun; Y-M Li; X Wang; H-C Cao
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Cervical myelopathy as a complication of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  A C Arlt; J Steinmetz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Prognostic value of intraoperative MEP signal improvement during surgical treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Ye Tian; Chu Wang; Xin Lu; Qianyu Zhuang; Huiming Peng; Jianhua Hu; Yu Zhao; Jianxiong Shen; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by oblique corpectomies without fusion.

Authors:  R Kemal Koç; Ahmet Menkü; Hidayet Akdemir; Bülent Tucer; Ali Kurtsoy; I Suat Oktem
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Is extensive cervical laminoplasty an effective treatment for spinal cord sarcoidosis combined with cervical spondylosis?

Authors:  Keisuke Oe; Minoru Doita; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Fumio Kanda; Masahiro Kurosaka; Masatoshi Sumi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.