Literature DB >> 26951171

Prognostic value of intraoperative MEP signal improvement during surgical treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy.

Shujie Wang1, Ye Tian2, Chu Wang1, Xin Lu1, Qianyu Zhuang1, Huiming Peng1, Jianhua Hu1, Yu Zhao1, Jianxiong Shen1, Xisheng Weng1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the prognostic value of intraoperative improved transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) after cervical cord decompressive surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM).
METHOD: A consecutive series of 59 CCM patients who underwent cervical cord decompressive surgery were studied between December 2013 and April 2015 in this study. And all patients were divided into three subgroups: the patients with intraoperative improved MEP, without obvious MEP change and MEP degeneration. MEP and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score were mainly utilized to assess intra-, pre- and post-operative neurologic function; all patients had reliable and stable MEP baseline. The early neurologic outcomes and the long-term mJOA improvement rate were evaluated after surgery.
RESULTS: There were 21 patients with intraoperative monitoring improvement (MEP improved rate, 140 ± 76 %), 32 patients without obvious MEP change and six patients with MEP degeneration. The early motor or sensory outcome showed varying degrees of recovery in the MEP improvement group. The long-term mJOA improvement rate among the three groups was 59.5 ± 4.2, 48.9 ± 3.9 and 40.6 ± 7.4 %, respectively, after 6-month follow-up, and the improvement group was better than the other two groups with statistical significance (59.5 ± 4.2 vs. 48.9 ± 3.9 %, p < 0.05; 59.5 ± 4.2 vs. 40.6 ± 7.4, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patients with intraoperative MEP improvement after cervical cord decompression have better prognosis in early and long-term neurologic recovery in CCM surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM); MEP improvement; MJOA improvement rate; Neurologic function recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26951171     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4477-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  T F Mehalic; R T Pezzuti; B I Applebaum
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Electrophysiological evidence of functional improvement in the corticospinal tract after laminoplasty in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: clinical article.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Naosuke Kamei; Ryo Ohta; Yuki Fujioka; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Satoshi Ujigo; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-05-23

3.  Prognostic value of changes in spinal cord signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Kenzo Uchida; Hideaki Nakajima; Naoto Takeura; Takafumi Yayama; Alexander Rodriguez Guerrero; Ai Yoshida; Takumi Sakamoto; Kazuya Honjoh; Hisatoshi Baba
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Continuous intraoperative electromyographic and transcranial motor evoked potential recordings in spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Spyridon Voulgaris; Dimitrios Karagiorgiadis; George A Alexiou; Evaggelos Mihos; Andreas Zigouris; George Fotakopoulos; Dimitrios Drosos; Dimitrios Pahaturidis
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Y Okada; T Ikata; H Yamada; R Sakamoto; S Katoh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Anoushka Singh; Eric M Massicotte; Paul M Arnold; Darrel S Brodke; Daniel C Norvell; Jeffrey T Hermsmeyer; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting prognosis.

Authors:  S Naderi; S Ozgen; M N Pamir; M M Ozek; C Erzen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Pathomechanism of myelopathy and surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Masahiko Kanamori; Hirokazu Ishihara; Kazuo Ohmori; Yumiko Abe; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts.

Authors:  Vedran Deletis; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2016.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prevention of spinal cord injury using brain-evoked muscle-action potential (Br(E)-MsEP) monitoring in cervical spinal screw fixation.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Tetsuro Hida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring outcomes between cervical and thoracic spine surgery.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Yuan Tian; Xiangquan Lin; Zhifu Ren; Yu Zhao; Jiliang Zhai; Xiaojuan Zhang; Yanwei Zhao; Yingyue Dong; Congran Zhao; Ye Tian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Machine Learning Application of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential to Predict Positive Functional Outcomes of Patients.

Authors:  Mohd Redzuan Jamaludin; Khin Wee Lai; Joon Huang Chuah; Muhammad Afiq Zaki; Khairunnisa Hasikin; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak; Samiappan Dhanalakshmi; Lim Beng Saw; Xiang Wu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20

5.  The prediction of intraoperative cervical cord function changes by different motor evoked potentials phenotypes in cervical myelopathy patients.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Zhifu Ren; Jia Liu; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Clinical Significance of Improved Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Signal during Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Institution Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Seung Myung Wi; Hui-Jong Lee; Taehoon Kang; Sam Yeol Chang; Sung-Min Kim; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Hyoungmin Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-11-08

7.  A Comparative Study on the Minimal Invasiveness of Full-Endoscopic and Microendoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy Using Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirahata; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Muneyoshi Fujita; Ryutaro Shiboi; Hirotaka Kawano; Hiroki Iwai; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Successful Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Cervical Myelopathy : Related Factors and the Effect of Increased Stimulation Intensity.

Authors:  Hyok Ki Shim; Jae Meen Lee; Dong Hwan Kim; Kyoung Hyup Nam; Byung Kwan Choi; In Ho Han
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2020-12-24

9.  Do Intraoperative Neurophysiological Changes During Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Myeloradiculopathy Affect Functional Outcome? A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Keyur Kantilal Akbari; Vigneshwara Badikillaya; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Sajan K Hegde
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-22

10.  The effect of positive changes during intraoperative monitoring of the functional improvement in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Min Kyu Park; Sook Joung Lee; Sang Beom Kim; Kyeong Woo Lee; Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun Young Han; Bo Ryun Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.