Literature DB >> 25403500

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis correlates with surgical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

L-Q Sun1, Y-M Li1, X Wang1, H-C Cao1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether preoperative and postoperative changes of signal intensity (SI) and transverse area (TA) of the spinal cord reflect the surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
SETTING: The Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
METHODS: In 45 consecutive prospective patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale was used to quantify the neurological status at admission and of at least 12-month follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative TA of the spinal cord at the site of maximal compression and grayscale of signal intensity (GSI) were measured using the image analysis software. Ratio of transverse area (RTA) and ratio of grayscale of signal intensity (RGSI) were used to assess the extent of spinal cord re-expansion and extent of SI regression. Preoperative status and postoperative recovery were assessed in relation to MRI parameters preoperatively and postoperatively using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Higher baseline JOA scores were associated with larger TA. Greater recovery rate was associated with larger preoperative and postoperative TA, along with greater RTA. Recovery rate negatively correlated with RGSI and age. Higher baseline JOA score was associated with greater recovery rate. RGSI negatively correlated with RTA. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis showed that the optimal combination of surgical outcome predictors included age, postoperative TA and RGSI.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI analysis in CSM may provide reliable information for the prediction of the postoperative outcome of CSM patients. MRI indicators of good outcome include the larger postoperative TA and greater RGSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403500     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  J C Wang; W D Yu; H S Sandhu; V Tam; R B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  I Ohshio; A Hatayama; K Kaneda; M Takahara; K Nagashima
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and mri of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Y Morio; R Teshima; H Nagashima; K Nawata; D Yamasaki; Y Nanjo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jun Jae Shin; Byung Ho Jin; Keun Su Kim; Yong Eun Cho; Woo Ho Cho
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict neurological recovery after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with blinded assessments.

Authors:  Babak Arvin; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Alina Karpova; David Mercier; Julio C Furlan; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Alina Karpova; Ranganathan Arun; Aileen M Davis; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Eric M Massicotte; David J Mikulis; Zvonimir I Lubina; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Y Okada; T Ikata; H Yamada; R Sakamoto; S Katoh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Hisatake Yoshihara; Makoto Yanase; Keigo Ito
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Clinicopathological study of "snake-eye appearance" in compressive myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Junichi Mizuno; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Tatsushi Inoue; Yoshio Hashizume
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  1 in total

1.  Early expansive single sided laminoplasty decompression treatment severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chaohua Yang; Qing Wang; Shuang Xu; Can Guan; Guangzhou Li; Gaoju Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.