Literature DB >> 24891864

Long term effect on adjacent segment motion after posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Tack Geun Cho1, Young Baeg Kim2, Seung Won Park2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) is a motion-preserving surgical technique. The objective was to determine whether PCF alter cervical motion as a long-term influence.
METHODS: Thirty one patients who followed up more than 36 months after PCF for cervical radiculopathy from January 2004 to September 2008 were enrolled in this study. The range of motion (ROM) of whole cervical spine, the operated segment, the cranial and the caudal adjacent segment were obtained. The clinical result and the change of ROMs were compared with those in the patients performed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) during the same period.
RESULTS: In PCF group, the ROM of whole cervical spine had no significant difference in statistically at preoperative and last follow up. The operated segment ROM was significantly decreased from 11.02±5.72 to 8.82±6.65 (p<0.05). The ROM of cranial adjacent segment was slightly increased from 10.42±5.13 to 11.02±5.41 and the ROM of caudal adjacent segment was decreased from 9.44±6.26 to 8.73±5.92, however these data were not meaningful statistically. In ACDF group, the operated ROM was decreased and unlike in PCF group, especially the ROM of caudal adjacent segment was increased from 9.39±4.21 to 11.33±5.07 (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: As part of the long-term effects of PCF on cervical motion, the operated segment motions decreased but were preserved after PCF. However, unlikely after ACDF, the ROMs of the adjacent segment did not increase after PCF. PCF, by maintaining the motion of the operated segment, imposes less stress on the adjacent segments. This may be one of its advantages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent segment; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Posterior cervical foraminotomy; Range of motion

Year:  2014        PMID: 24891864      PMCID: PMC4040637          DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Spine        ISSN: 1738-2262


  27 in total

1.  The influence of intervertebral disc shape on the pathway of posterior/posterolateral partial herniation.

Authors:  Justin P Yates; Lora Giangregorio; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Wai-Mun Yue; Wolfram Brodner; Thomas R Highland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posterior cervical foraminotomy. A follow-up study of 67 surgically treated patients with compressive radiculopathy.

Authors:  A Witzmann; N Hejazi; L Krasznai
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Long-lasting cervical radicular pain managed with surgery, physiotherapy, or a cervical collar. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  L C Persson; C A Carlsson; J Y Carlsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review.

Authors:  K Bush; S Hillier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Same-segment and adjacent-segment disease following posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Michelle J Clarke; Robert D Ecker; William E Krauss; Robyn L McClelland; Mark B Dekutoski
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-01

7.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.

Authors:  H Baba; N Furusawa; S Imura; N Kawahara; H Tsuchiya; K Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Adjacent segment disease: an uncommon complication after cervical expansile laminoplasty: case report.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang; Barth A Green; Elizabeth Vitarbo; Allan D O Levi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall; H Malchau
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Francis H Shen; Craig Lyon; Mathew Phillips; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery: What does the future hold?

Authors:  R Misra; N K Rath
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-24

Review 2.  UPPER CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: THE HIDDEN PATHOLOGY OF THE SPINE.

Authors:  Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter B Derman; Philip K Louie; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-02-28

3.  Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Platt; Richard G Fessler; Vincent C Traynelis; John E O'Toole
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-12-08

4.  Cervical disc hernia operations through posterior laminoforaminotomy.

Authors:  Coskun Yolas; Nuriye Guzin Ozdemir; Hilmi Onder Okay; Ayhan Kanat; Mehmet Senol; Ibrahim Burak Atci; Hakan Yilmaz; Mustafa Kemal Coban; Mehmet Onur Yuksel; Umit Kahraman
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

5.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Day-care Posterior Foraminotomy and Decompression of the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Manoj Dayalal Singrakhia; Nikhil Ramdas Malewar; Sonal Deshmukh; Shivaji Deshmukh
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

6.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenguang Fang; Lijun Huang; Feng Feng; Bu Yang; Lei He; Guizhong Du; Peigen Xie; Zihao Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.