Literature DB >> 22270247

Anatomical study of the cervical nerve roots for posterior foraminotomy: cadaveric study.

Mohamed Barakat1, Youssef Hussein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anatomical study of the relationship among the cervical nerve roots, intervertebral disc, and lateral mass is important for the neurosurgeon to avoid complications of posterior cervical foraminotomy.
METHODS: Six adult cadavers were studied. The muscles of the back of the neck were removed to expose the cervical vertebrae posteriorly from C3 to C7. We measured the length, height, extent, and angulations of the nerve roots from the medial point of the facet (MPF) after a total laminectomy, then after one-half facetectomy. The height, width, anteroposterior diameter of the lateral mass, then the height and anteroposterior diameter of the neural foramen were also measured.
RESULTS: After total laminectomy from C3 to C7, all measures were taken from MPF showed that the mean length of the exposed root was 6.5-8.8 mm while vertical distance was 4-5.4 mm and the horizontal distance was 5.1-7.1 mm. Following a medial one-half facetectomy; the mean length of the exposed root was 8.9-12.3 mm, the vertical distance was 5.5-7.3 mm while the horizontal distance was 7.1-9.8 mm. The mean angulations of the nerve roots were 50.9-53.3º. There was a significant difference after total laminectomy and medial one-half facetectomy.
CONCLUSION: Anatomic and morphologic study of the cervical nerve roots and their relationships to the lateral mass and the intervertebral disc are useful landmarks to reduce the operative complications of the posterior foraminotomy.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270247      PMCID: PMC3389111          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2158-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  Endoscopic foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  S W Roh; D H Kim; A C Cardoso; R G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion.

Authors:  B H Chen; R N Natarajan; H S An; G B Andersson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-02

3.  Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Richard G Fessler; Larry T Khoo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Morphometric study of the nerve roots around the lateral mass for posterior foraminotomy.

Authors:  Jae-Chan Hwang; Hak-Geun Bae; Sung-Won Cho; Sung-Jin Cho; Hyung-Ki Park; Jae-Chil Chang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

5.  Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: a preliminary report.

Authors:  H Baba; Q Chen; K Uchida; S Imura; S Morikawa; K Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases.

Authors:  T E Adamson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy with three-dimensional microscopic visualization and localization with anterior/posterior imaging.

Authors:  Donald L Hilton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Cervical laminoforaminotomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Timothy C Ryken; Paul G Matz; Paul A Anderson; Michael W Groff; Langston T Holly; Michael G Kaiser; Praveen V Mummaneni; Tanvir F Choudhri; Edward J Vresilovic; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

9.  Morphometric and volumetric analysis of the lateral masses of the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  Kalil G Abdullah; Michael P Steinmetz; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients.

Authors:  Y S Cağlar; M Bozkurt; G Kahilogullari; H Tuna; A Bakir; F Torun; H C Ugur
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2007-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis.

Authors:  Takuto Kurakawa; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Shuichi Kaneyama; Masatoshi Sumi; Koki Uno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Abduction extension cervical nerve root stress test: anatomical basis and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M Farshad; K Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy for laterally located soft disk herniation.

Authors:  Chi Heon Kim; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Sung Bae Park; Seung Heon Yang; Sung Mi Kim; Joo-Kyung Sung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Day-care Posterior Foraminotomy and Decompression of the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Manoj Dayalal Singrakhia; Nikhil Ramdas Malewar; Sonal Deshmukh; Shivaji Deshmukh
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  Cervicothoracic junction disc herniation: Our experience, technical remarks, and outcome.

Authors:  Keyvan Mostofi; Morad Peyravi; Babak Gharaei Moghadam
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-04-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.