Literature DB >> 21063690

Doing better than your best: loud auditory stimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force.

Anam Anzak1, Huiling Tan, Alek Pogosyan, Peter Brown.   

Abstract

Could task performance be constrained by our ability to fully engage necessary neural processing through effort of will? The StartReact phenomenon suggests that this might be the case, as voluntary reaction times are substantially reduced by loud sounds. Here, we show that loud auditory stimulation can also be associated with an improvement in the force and speed of force development when 18 healthy subjects are repeatedly asked to make a maximal grip as fast and as strongly as possible. Peak grip force was increased by 7.2 ± 1.4% (SEM) (P < 0.0001), and the rate of force development was increased by 17.6 ± 2.0% (P < 0.00001), when imperative visual cues were accompanied by a loud auditory stimulus rather than delivered alone. This implies that loud auditory stimuli may allow motor pathways to be optimised beyond what can be achieved by effort of will alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21063690     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2474-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.

Authors:  J Miller; V Franz; R Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

2.  [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].

Authors:  C C Dufft; R Ulrich
Journal:  Z Exp Psychol       Date:  1999

3.  Accessory stimulation in the time course of visuomotor information processing: stimulus intensity effects on reaction time and response force.

Authors:  Jutta Stahl; Thomas H Rammsayer
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2005-03-23

4.  The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Guido P H Band; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Absence of coactivation in the motor component: evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; J Miller; A C Roch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  On the reliability and usefulness of methods for grip strength measurement.

Authors:  C Lagerström; B Nordgren
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1998-06

7.  Towards a model of stress and human performance.

Authors:  A F Sanders
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1983-04

8.  Why don't we move faster? Parkinson's disease, movement vigor, and implicit motivation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; Anna Hristova; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The effects of an auditory startle on obstacle avoidance during walking.

Authors:  Ana Queralt; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Hanneke J R van Duijnhoven; Juan M Castellote; Josep Valls-Solé; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Analysis of force profile during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction task.

Authors:  Elizabeth Househam; John McAuley; Thompson Charles; Timothy Lightfoot; Michael Swash
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  12 in total

1.  Imbalanced Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Spasticity in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Subthalamic nucleus activity optimizes maximal effort motor responses in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Anam Anzak; Huiling Tan; Alek Pogosyan; Thomas Foltynie; Patricia Limousin; Ludvic Zrinzo; Marwan Hariz; Keyoumars Ashkan; Marko Bogdanovic; Alexander L Green; Tipu Aziz; Peter Brown
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Startle auditory stimuli enhance the performance of fast dynamic contractions.

Authors:  Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo; Dan Río-Rodríguez; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; Rafael M Acero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Subcortical evoked activity and motor enhancement in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Anam Anzak; Huiling Tan; Alek Pogosyan; Sadaquate Khan; Shazia Javed; Steven S Gill; Keyoumars Ashkan; Harith Akram; Thomas Foltynie; Patricia Limousin; Ludvic Zrinzo; Alexander L Green; Tipu Aziz; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Immediate effects of different frequencies of auditory stimulation on lower limb motor function of healthy people.

Authors:  Lili Yu; Qiuchen Huang; Chunying Hu; Miao Ye
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Minal Bhadane; Fan Gao; Ping Zhou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  A loud auditory stimulus overcomes voluntary movement limitation in cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Tereza Serranová; Robert Jech; Maria José Martí; Raluca Modreanu; Francesc Valldeoriola; Tomáš Sieger; Evžen Růžička; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Frequency specific activity in subthalamic nucleus correlates with hand bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Huiling Tan; Alek Pogosyan; Anam Anzak; Thomas Foltynie; Patricia Limousin; Ludvic Zrinzo; Keyoumars Ashkan; Marko Bogdanovic; Alexander L Green; Tipu Aziz; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Different Effects of Startling Acoustic Stimuli (SAS) on TMS-Induced Responses at Rest and during Sustained Voluntary Contraction.

Authors:  Yen-Ting Chen; Shengai Li; Ping Zhou; Sheng Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Reticulospinal Systems for Tuning Motor Commands.

Authors:  Robert M Brownstone; Jeremy W Chopek
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.