Literature DB >> 25925321

Accessory stimulus modulates executive function during stepping task.

Tatsunori Watanabe1, Soichiro Koyama2, Shigeo Tanabe3, Ippei Nojima4.   

Abstract

When multiple sensory modalities are simultaneously presented, reaction time can be reduced while interference enlarges. The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of task-irrelevant acoustic accessory stimuli simultaneously presented with visual imperative stimuli on executive function during stepping. Executive functions were assessed by analyzing temporal events and errors in the initial weight transfer of the postural responses prior to a step (anticipatory postural adjustment errors). Eleven healthy young adults stepped forward in response to a visual stimulus. We applied a choice reaction time task and the Simon task, which consisted of congruent and incongruent conditions. Accessory stimuli were randomly presented with the visual stimuli. Compared with trials without accessory stimuli, the anticipatory postural adjustment error rates were higher in trials with accessory stimuli in the incongruent condition and the reaction times were shorter in trials with accessory stimuli in all the task conditions. Analyses after division of trials according to whether anticipatory postural adjustment error occurred or not revealed that the reaction times of trials with anticipatory postural adjustment errors were reduced more than those of trials without anticipatory postural adjustment errors in the incongruent condition. These results suggest that accessory stimuli modulate the initial motor programming of stepping by lowering decision threshold and exclusively under spatial incompatibility facilitate automatic response activation. The present findings advance the knowledge of intersensory judgment processes during stepping and may aid in the development of intervention and evaluation tools for individuals at risk of falls.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accessory stimulus; executive function; inhibition; judgment; postural control

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25925321      PMCID: PMC4509393          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00222.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.

Authors:  J Miller; V Franz; R Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

2.  The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Guido P H Band; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The association between choice stepping reaction time and falls in older adults--a path analysis model.

Authors:  Mirjam Pijnappels; Kim Delbaere; Daina L Sturnieks; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Bettina Rolke; Daniel Bratzke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-21

5.  Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Bettina Rolke; Daniel Bratzke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-07-02

6.  Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Franziska Plessow; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

7.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation.

Authors:  J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

8.  Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; A Solé; F Valldeoriola; E Muñoz; L E Gonzalez; E S Tolosa
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  The effects of an auditory startle on obstacle avoidance during walking.

Authors:  Ana Queralt; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Hanneke J R van Duijnhoven; Juan M Castellote; Josep Valls-Solé; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Speeding up gait initiation and gait-pattern with a startling stimulus.

Authors:  Ana Queralt; Josep Valls-Solé; Juan M Castellote
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Performance monitoring and response conflict resolution associated with choice stepping reaction tasks.

Authors:  Tatsunori Watanabe; Kotaro Tsutou; Kotaro Saito; Kazuto Ishida; Shigeo Tanabe; Ippei Nojima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Auditory stimulus has a larger effect on anticipatory postural adjustments in older than young adults during choice step reaction.

Authors:  Tatsunori Watanabe; Kotaro Saito; Kazuto Ishida; Shigeo Tanabe; Ippei Nojima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Moving Forward by Stimulating the Brain: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Heather T Peters; Dylan J Edwards; Susan Wortman-Jutt; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The Effect of Prior Knowledge of Color on Behavioral Responses and Event-Related Potentials During Go/No-go Task.

Authors:  Nami Kubo; Tatsunori Watanabe; Xiaoxiao Chen; Takuya Matsumoto; Keisuke Yunoki; Takayuki Kuwabara; Hikari Kirimoto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Modulation of EMG-EMG Coherence in a Choice Stepping Task.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsunori Watanabe; Kotaro Saito; Shigeo Tanabe; Hoshinori Kanazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.