Literature DB >> 10070199

Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: evidence for dual orienting mechanisms.

S P Tipper1, H Jordan, B Weaver.   

Abstract

We investigated whether inhibition of return (IOR) could be observed in location-based, scene-based, and object-centered frames of reference. IOR was found to move both with a separate cued object (scene-based) and with a location within a single rotating object (object-centered). Importantly, however, IOR was also associated with the environmental location cued when cuing was of a separate object (scene-based), whereas facilitation of the cued location was found when cuing was of a component within an object. These results suggest that location is of central importance to scene-based representations of separate objects, which appear to be encoded in viewer-centered coordinates, whereas environmental locus is of little relevance when attention orients within a single object. The results also provide further evidence for the coexistence of both excitation and inhibition associated with uninformative exogenous cues.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070199     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  19 in total

1.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

2.  Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Lana M Trick; Diana Audet; Lynn Dales
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

3.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Mathew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

4.  Inhibition of object identity in inhibition of return: implications for encoding and retrieving inhibitory processes.

Authors:  Sarah Grison; Matthew A Paul; Klaus Kessler; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

5.  Observation of a finger or an object movement primes imitative responses differentially.

Authors:  M Jonas; K Biermann-Ruben; K Kessler; R Lange; T Bäumer; H R Siebner; A Schnitzler; A Münchau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inhibition of return and action affordances.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of affordances in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Annalisa Oppo; Giovanni Buccino; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

8.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Objects or Locations in Vision for Action? Evidence from the MILO task.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-01-01

10.  Between-trial inhibition and facilitation in goal-directed aiming: manual and spatial asymmetries.

Authors:  Luc Tremblay; Timothy N Welsh; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.