Literature DB >> 16491408

Inhibition of return and action affordances.

Helen M Morgan1, Steven P Tipper.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that inhibition of return (IOR) operates on identity-specific object representations and does not spread to semantically related items (Morgan et al. in Eur J Cogn Psychol 17(4):499-520, 2005). The current study further examines the representations underlying IOR by investigating whether IOR is influenced by action-related properties of objects. An exogenous cue appeared on the side of an object that was either compatible or incompatible with the action afforded by the object. Then a target requiring a rapid key-press or reach localisation response appeared on the cued or uncued side. Responses were slower to cued versus uncued targets, but this IOR effect did not interact with action-compatibility. These results show that IOR does not appear to operate on visuomotor representations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491408     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0363-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in a selective reaching task: an investigation of reference frames.

Authors:  L A Howard; J Lupiáñez; S P Tipper
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response.

Authors:  E Poliakoff; C Spence; D J O'Boyle; F P McGlone; F W J Cody
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Long-term inhibition of return of attention.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper; Sarah Grison; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-01

4.  Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes.

Authors:  Matthew A Paul; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing.

Authors:  J Grèzes; M Tucker; J Armony; R Ellis; R E Passingham
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-11-24

7.  Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper; Matthew A Paul; Amy E Hayes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

8.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Hand deviations away from visual cues: indirect evidence for inhibition.

Authors:  L A Howard; S P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.