Literature DB >> 17484440

The role of affordances in inhibition of return.

Lucia Riggio1, Ilaria Patteri, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Buccino, Carlo Umiltà.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is a response delay that occurs when the target is preceded by an irrelevant stimulus (cue) at the same location. IOR can be object based, as well as location based. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the pragmatic features of a visually presented object in causing IOR. Two experiments were carried out using different objects as stimuli, for which the graspable part (affordance) was clearly defined. The presentation of a whole object, with the part commonly used to grasp it located below, served as a cue. The presentation of either the graspable or the ungraspable part of the cued or uncued object served as the target. Results showed that responses were slower when the graspable part was shown in the cued location than when the ungraspable part was shown in the same location. The effect was apparently linked to the kind of action necessary to grasp an object.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17484440     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation.

Authors:  A Sapir; N Soroker; A Berger; A Henik
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP.

Authors:  A Murata; V Gallese; G Luppino; M Kaseda; H Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Selective attention to the parts of an object.

Authors:  S P Vecera; M Behrmann; J McGoldrick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

4.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing.

Authors:  J Grèzes; M Tucker; J Armony; R Ellis; R E Passingham
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Coding the locations of objects in the dark.

Authors:  M S Graziano; X T Hu; C G Gross
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; G Buccino; S Posse; R J Seitz; G Rizzolatti; H Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  5 in total

1.  Shape selectivity in primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  Xinmiao Peng; Margaret E Sereno; Amanda K Silva; Sidney R Lehky; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Authors:  Ariane Leão Caldas; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Olga Daneyko; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-27

3.  Attention is required for the perceptual integration of action object pairs.

Authors:  Nicolas A McNair; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.