Literature DB >> 3736801

Comparison among three methods of intracranial pressure recording.

B North, P Reilly.   

Abstract

Fluid-coupled recording systems are the most popular method of recording intracranial pressure (ICP), but they can be prone to blockage and infection. A series of 378 recordings of ICP was analyzed to identify complications and cases in which recording had to be discontinued prematurely because of catheter blockage. Three different methods of ICP recording were used: a ventricular catheter, a Richmond screw, and a subdural catheter. Richmond screws became blocked more often (16%) than subdural catheters (2.7%) or ventricular catheters (2.5%). Complications of infection and intracerebral hemorrhage were observed mostly in the ventricular catheter patients. Of these three methods, a subdural catheter is the preferred method of recording ICP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3736801     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198606000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

1.  Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.

Authors:  A Bekar; S Gören; E Korfali; K Aksoy; S Boyaci
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Evaluation of minimally invasive percutaneous CT-controlled ventriculostomy in patients with severe head trauma.

Authors:  M Krötz; U Linsenmaier; K G Kanz; K J Pfeifer; W Mutschler; M Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Neuromonitoring in neurological critical care.

Authors:  Ian F Dunn; Dilantha B Ellegala; Dong H Kim; Zachary N Litvack
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension. I. Experimental study.

Authors:  K Helmke; H C Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996-10

5.  Bleeding and infection with external ventricular drainage: a systematic review in comparison with adjudicated adverse events in the ongoing Clot Lysis Evaluating Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage Phase III (CLEAR-III IHV) trial.

Authors:  Mahua Dey; Agnieszka Stadnik; Fady Riad; Lingjiao Zhang; Nichol McBee; Carlos Kase; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Malathi Ram; Karen Lane; Noeleen Ostapkovich; Francois Aldrich; Charlene Aldrich; Jack Jallo; Ken Butcher; Ryan Snider; Daniel Hanley; Wendy Ziai; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Hemorrhagic Complications Associated with Ventriculostomy in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Jack M Leschke; Andrew Lozen; Mayank Kaushal; Akinwunmi Oni-Orisan; Mazen Noufal; Osama Zaidat; Glen A Pollock; Wade M Mueller
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Camino intracranial pressure monitor: prospective study of accuracy and complications.

Authors:  R M Martínez-Mañas; D Santamarta; J M de Campos; E Ferrer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Placement of external ventricular drains and intracranial pressure monitors by neurointensivists.

Authors:  As'ad Ehtisham; Scott Taylor; Linda Bayless; Michael W Klein; Jeff M Janzen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in children: comparison of external ventricular device with the fiberoptic system.

Authors:  G Gambardella; C Zaccone; E Cardia; F Tomasello
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 10.  Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel D Binz; L Gerard Toussaint; Jonathan A Friedman
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.