Literature DB >> 10051783

Gender and willingness to undergo invasive cardiac procedures.

S Saha1, G D Stettin, R F Redberg.   

Abstract

To explore the role of patient preferences in explaining gender differences in the use of invasive cardiac procedures, we surveyed 174 patients presenting for cardiac stress testing at a university hospital. Controlling for sociodemographic factors, health status, symptom severity, and history of prior procedures, women expressed greater willingness than men to accept a physician's recommendation of cardiac catheterization (odds ratio 7.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1, 45.3) and similar willingness to accept a recommendation for coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We conclude that patient preferences are unlikely to explain gender disparities in the use of invasive cardiac procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10051783     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00297.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  14 in total

1.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Gender differences in the management of acute chest pain. Support for the "Yentl syndrome".

Authors:  P A Johnson; L Goldman; E J Orav; L Zhou; T Garcia; S D Pearson; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Attitudes about treatment of coronary heart disease among women and men presenting for exercise testing.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; A M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment?

Authors:  N A Bickell; K S Pieper; K L Lee; D B Mark; D D Glower; D B Pryor; R M Califf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias?

Authors:  H M Krumholz; P S Douglas; M S Lauer; R C Pasternak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  A closer examination of sex bias in the treatment of ischemic cardiac disease.

Authors:  L A Green; M T Ruffin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias.

Authors:  S S Khan; S Nessim; R Gray; L S Czer; A Chaux; J Matloff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  J N Tobin; S Wassertheil-Smoller; J P Wexler; R M Steingart; N Budner; L Lense; J Wachspress
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A community-wide perspective of gender differences and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D E Chiriboga; J Yarzebski; R J Goldberg; Z Chen; J Gurwitz; J M Gore; J S Alpert; J E Dalen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L J Shaw; D D Miller; J C Romeis; D Kargl; L T Younis; B R Chaitman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

1.  The boomers are coming: a total cost of care model of the impact of population aging on health care costs in the United States by Major Practice Category.

Authors:  E Mary Martini; Nancy Garrett; Tammie Lindquist; George J Isham
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.

Authors:  Katie E Golden; Anna Marie Chang; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  Examining sex and gender disparities in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wendy M Novicoff; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Alan K Berger; Sue Duval; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Gender disparities in the presentation, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients: data from the 2nd Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2).

Authors:  Abdulla Shehab; Bayan Al-Dabbagh; Khalid F AlHabib; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Wael Almahmeed; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Nicolaas Nagelkerke; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Ahmad Hersi; Hussam Al Faleh; Nidal Asaad; Shukri Al Saif; Haitham Amin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.