Literature DB >> 8744878

Gender differences in the management of acute chest pain. Support for the "Yentl syndrome".

P A Johnson1, L Goldman, E J Orav, L Zhou, T Garcia, S D Pearson, T H Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether evaluation and management of males and females differ after presentation to the emergency department with acute chest pain.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with follow-up at 1 month.
SETTING: Urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The study population included 1,411 patients who were 30 years of age or older who visited the emergency department with acute chest pain from October 1990 through May 1992. These 1,411 patients represent 69% of the 2,056 patients approached for consent. The utilization of exercise stress testing as outpatients was measured for a subset of 954 patients who were interviewed at 1 month after their presentation. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN
RESULTS: After controlling for clinical and nonclinical predictors, women were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47, 0.99). Among the 954 patients with 1-month follow-up, women were less likely than men to undergo an exercise stress test during the first month after presentation, with borderline statistical significance after adjusting for the interaction between gender and admission to the hospital (adjusted OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09, 1.0). Among the patients who were admitted to the hospital, women were as likely as men to undergo exercise stress testing (adjusted OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.57, 1.2) but were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization (adjusted OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25, 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Gender-based differences in management may occur at several stages in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. Observed differences in use of invasive procedures between men and women may be due in part to lower rates of exercise test use and admission to the hospital for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8744878     DOI: 10.1007/bf02642477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Underutilization of thrombolytic therapy in eligible women with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C Maynard; R Althouse; M Cerqueira; M Olsufka; J W Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The changing pattern of coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  G T Christakis; J Ivanov; R D Weisel; P L Birnbaum; T E David; T A Salerno
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry.

Authors:  C Maynard; P E Litwin; J S Martin; W D Weaver
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

4.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  L Goldman; E F Cook; D A Brand; T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias?

Authors:  H M Krumholz; P S Douglas; M S Lauer; R C Pasternak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Influence of age on results of coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  W S Weintraub; J M Craver; C L Cohen; E L Jones; R A Guyton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry.

Authors:  S F Kelsey; M James; A L Holubkov; R Holubkov; M J Cowley; K M Detre
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Comparison of the long-term, postsurgical survival of women and men in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).

Authors:  E D Eaker; R Kronmal; J W Kennedy; K Davis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gender and coronary disease.

Authors:  N H Fiebach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Ethnic Group Differences in the Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment.

Authors:  Brian Merry; Claudia M Campbell; Luis F Buenaver; Lynanne McGuire; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Daniel M Doleys; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Pain       Date:  2011-01

3.  Gender and willingness to undergo invasive cardiac procedures.

Authors:  S Saha; G D Stettin; R F Redberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.