Literature DB >> 10048811

Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system.

D L Miller1, S Bao, J E Morris.   

Abstract

Suspensions of Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to ultrasound in the presence of fluorescent dextran to determine the conditions needed for sonoporation with uptake of the large molecules. Albunex, a gas-body- based ultrasound contrast agent, was added to enhance cavitation. Ultrasound was continuous wave at frequencies of 1.0, 1.68, 2.25, 3.3, 5.3, and 7.15 MHz. Sterile 4.5-mL exposure chambers were rotated at 60 rpm to promote cavitation activity during the 1-min exposures. After exposure, cells were tested for sonoporation by counting fluorescent cells and for cell lysis by counting cells stained by trypan blue. Sonoporation was a sensitive bioeffects indicator that was detected at pressure amplitudes lower than were needed for transient cavitation or cavitation-induced cell lysis. For 10% Albunex, apparent thresholds for sonoporation, which were comparable to the levels required to perturb the gas bodies, were 0.084 MPa (spatial peak negative pressure amplitude) from 1.0-3.3 MHz and 0.27 MPa at 5.3 and 7.15 MHz. Sonoporation decreased slightly if the tube was not rotated. The effects increased for increasing Albunex concentration (with rotation). The plating efficiency of cells exposed to 0.2 MPa at 2.25 MHz and sorted by a flow cytometer was 19% (3.6% standard deviation [SD]) for fluorescent cells, compared to 67% (1% SD) for nonfluorescent exposed cells and 62% (6% SD) for sham-exposed cells. The reduced viability represents an important consideration for possible applications of sonoporation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10048811     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00137-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  19 in total

1.  Cytoplasmic molecular delivery with shock waves: importance of impulse.

Authors:  T Kodama; M R Hamblin; A G Doukas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jing Yan; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Effects of cell culture scaffold stiffness on cell membrane damage induced by sonoporation.

Authors:  Nobuki Kudo; Yuto Kinoshita
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Analysis of in vitro transfection by sonoporation using cationic and neutral microbubbles.

Authors:  Jose L Tlaxca; Christopher R Anderson; Alexander L Klibanov; Bryce Lowrey; John A Hossack; J Steven Alexander; Michael B Lawrence; Joshua J Rychak
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Microbubbles in Imaging: Applications Beyond Ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul Kogan; Ryan C Gessner; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Bubble Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2010-06

7.  Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joseph Rich; Zhenhua Tian; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-09-14

8.  Sonoporation-mediated gene transfer into adult rat dorsal root ganglion cells.

Authors:  Chung-Ren Lin; Kuan-Hung Chen; Chien-Hui Yang; Jiin-Tsuey Cheng; Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen; Chih-Hsien Wu; Wei-Dih Sy; Yi-Shen Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 8.410

9.  In vitro gene delivery with ultrasound-triggered polymer microbubbles.

Authors:  Michael Cochran; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Induction of apoptosis in sonoporation and ultrasonic gene transfer.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Chunyan Dou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.