Literature DB >> 23562023

In vitro gene delivery with ultrasound-triggered polymer microbubbles.

Michael Cochran1, Margaret A Wheatley.   

Abstract

In the work described here, gene delivery using polymer microbubbles triggered by ultrasound in vitro was investigated. The effects of pressure amplitude (0-2 MPa), center frequency (1-5 MHz), pulse length (3-12,000 μs), pulse repetition frequency (5-20,000 Hz) and exposure time (0-30 s) on transfection efficiency and cell viability were examined. The effects of radiation force, calcium ion concentration and timing of treatments were also examined. Cells were successfully transfected with pressure amplitudes as low as 250 kPa. Transfection was most efficient at lower frequencies and longer pulse lengths, with a transfection efficiency of 24.2 ± 2.0% achieved using a center frequency of 1 MHz, pressure amplitude of 1 MPa, pulse length of 12,000 μs and pulse repetition frequency of 5 Hz. Gene delivery was also affected by the extracellular calcium ion concentration and the timing of treatments.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23562023      PMCID: PMC3683598          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  64 in total

1.  Investigation of microbubble response to long pulses used in ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery.

Authors:  Christophoros Mannaris; Michalakis A Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Optimal drug and gene delivery in cancer cells by ultrasound-induced cavitation.

Authors:  Irina V Larina; B Mark Evers; Rinat O Esenaliev
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  Claus-Dieter Ohl; Manish Arora; Roy Ikink; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Michael Delius; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Cellular signal transduction can be induced by TRAIL conjugated to microcapsules.

Authors:  Margaret A Wheatley; Michael C Cochran; John R Eisenbrey; Kelleny L Oum
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Ultrasonic destruction of albumin microbubbles enhances gene transfection and expression in cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  Guo-zhong Wang; Jing-hua Liu; Shu-zheng Lü; Yun Lü; Cheng-jun Guo; Dong-hui Zhao; Dong-ping Fang; Dong-fang He; Yuan Zhou; Chang-jiang Ge
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  On the mechanism of DNA transfection: efficient gene transfer without viruses.

Authors:  A Coonrod; F Q Li; M Horwitz
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Cell membrane resealing by a vesicular mechanism similar to neurotransmitter release.

Authors:  R A Steinhardt; G Bi; J M Alderton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Intracellular delivery and calcium transients generated in sonoporation facilitated by microbubbles.

Authors:  Z Fan; R E Kumon; J Park; C X Deng
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation.

Authors:  Bernadet D M Meijering; Lynda J M Juffermans; Annemieke van Wamel; Rob H Henning; Inge S Zuhorn; Marcia Emmer; Amanda M G Versteilen; Walter J Paulus; Wiek H van Gilst; Klazina Kooiman; Nico de Jong; René J P Musters; Leo E Deelman; Otto Kamp
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Liposomes for use in gene delivery.

Authors:  Daniel A Balazs; Wt Godbey
Journal:  J Drug Deliv       Date:  2010-12-15
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon L Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Inhibitory effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound sonication on the proliferation of osteosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Toshihiro Matsuo; Keiji Sato; Takuya Matsui; Shigeyuki Sawada; Yoshitaka Muramatsu; Katsuhisa Kawanami; Masataka Deie
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Spatial and Temporal Control of Cavitation Allows High In Vitro Transfection Efficiency in the Absence of Transfection Reagents or Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Kamel Chettab; Stéphanie Roux; Doriane Mathé; Emeline Cros-Perrial; Maxime Lafond; Cyril Lafon; Charles Dumontet; Jean-Louis Mestas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sonoporation of Cells by a Parallel Stable Cavitation Microbubble Array.

Authors:  Long Meng; Xiufang Liu; Yuchen Wang; Wenjun Zhang; Wei Zhou; Feiyan Cai; Fei Li; Junru Wu; Lisheng Xu; Lili Niu; Hairong Zheng
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 16.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.