Literature DB >> 10028639

Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment.

C F Njeh1, T Fuerst, D Hans, G M Blake, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a systematic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue which leads to diminished biomechanical competence of the skeleton and low-trauma or atraumatic fractures. Due to increased awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population, the use of bone densitometric techniques is becoming more widespread. Considerable progress has been made in the development of non-invasive methods for the assessment of the skeleton. While DXA and QCT are commonly used techniques, the popularity of other approaches such as RA, SXA and QUS is gaining grounds. QCT has an advantage over the other techniques in its ability to measure the true volumetric density of trabecular or cortical bone. We therefore present an overview of these current techniques for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. In the second section we discuss the radiation doses incurred in BMD measurements by patients and methods for reducing patient and staff radiation exposure are given. Studies of radiation dose to patient from DXA confirms that patient dose is small (0.08-4.6 muSv) compared to that given by many other investigations involving ionizing radiation. Fan beam technology with increased resolution has resulted in increase patient dose radiation dose (6.7-31 muSv) but this is still relatively small. Carrying vertebral morphometry using DXA also incurs less radiation dose (< 60 muSv) than standard lateral radiographs QCT has radiation dose (25-360 muSv) comparable to simple radiological examination such as chest X-ray but lower than imaging CT. Radiation dose from other techniques such as RA and SXA are in the same order of magnitude as pencil beam DXA. For pencil beam DXA and SXA systems the time average dose to staff from scatter is very low even with the operator sitting as close as 1 m from the patient during measurement. However the scatter dose from fan beam DXA systems is considerable higher and approaches limits set by regulator bodies for occupational exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10028639     DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00026-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot        ISSN: 0969-8043            Impact factor:   1.513


  39 in total

1.  Evaluation of the possibility to assess bone age on the basis of DXA derived hand scans-preliminary results.

Authors:  Paweł Płudowski; Michał Lebiedowski; Roman S Lorenc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Body composition data for individuals 8 years of age and older: U.S. population, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Lori G Borrud; Katherine M Flegal; Anne C Looker; James E Everhart; Tamara B Harris; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 11       Date:  2010-04

3.  The impact of technical conditions of X-ray imaging on reproducibility and precision of digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR).

Authors:  A Malich; J Boettcher; A Pfeil; D Sauner; J P Heyne; A Petrovitch; A Hansch; W Linss; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound based techniques.

Authors:  Paola Pisani; Maria Daniela Renna; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Maurizio Muratore; Eugenio Quarta; Marco Di Paola; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-28

5.  In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Luca M Sconfienza; Alberto Aliprandi; Giovanni Di Leo; Daniele Marchelli; Fabio M Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image.

Authors:  C M Langton; S Pisharody; J H Keyak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer.

Authors:  V Boudousq; P O Kotzki; J M Dinten; C Barrau; C Robert-Coutant; E Thomas; D Mariano Goulart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Joanna M Peloquin; Darrell S Pardi; William J Sandborn; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Beth A Schueler; James A Kofler; Felicity T B Enders; Sara J Achenbach; Edward V Loftus
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  DEXA as a predictor of fixator removal in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.