A G Heriot1, A Grundy, D Kumar. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including local excision, total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiotherapy, has increased the importance of accurate preoperative staging to allow the optimum treatment to be selected. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken of methods of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma and the evidence for each was evaluated critically. RESULTS: Clinical assessment of rectal carcinoma may give an indication of fixity but is not accurate for staging. Endoanal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radioimmunoscintigraphy and positron emission tomography have all been used for staging. The extent of tumour spread through the bowel wall (T stage) is most accurately assessed by endoanal ultrasonography, although this technique is poor at assessing tumour extension into adjacent organs for which both CT and MRI are more accurate. No method accurately determines lymph node involvement, but endoanal ultrasonography is the best available. Liver metastases may be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography, CT, MRI and CT portography (with increasing sensitivity and cost in that order). CONCLUSION: Endoanal ultrasonography is the most effective method of local tumour staging, with the addition of either CT or MRI if adjacent organ involvement is suspected. Abdominal ultrasonography or CT is recommended for routine preoperative assessment of the liver.
BACKGROUND: The development of treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including local excision, total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiotherapy, has increased the importance of accurate preoperative staging to allow the optimum treatment to be selected. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken of methods of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma and the evidence for each was evaluated critically. RESULTS: Clinical assessment of rectal carcinoma may give an indication of fixity but is not accurate for staging. Endoanal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radioimmunoscintigraphy and positron emission tomography have all been used for staging. The extent of tumour spread through the bowel wall (T stage) is most accurately assessed by endoanal ultrasonography, although this technique is poor at assessing tumour extension into adjacent organs for which both CT and MRI are more accurate. No method accurately determines lymph node involvement, but endoanal ultrasonography is the best available. Liver metastases may be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography, CT, MRI and CT portography (with increasing sensitivity and cost in that order). CONCLUSION: Endoanal ultrasonography is the most effective method of local tumour staging, with the addition of either CT or MRI if adjacent organ involvement is suspected. Abdominal ultrasonography or CT is recommended for routine preoperative assessment of the liver.
Authors: A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; N Fusco; P Broccoli; M Maurici; M Yamgoue; R Danieli; S D'Urso; G Simonetti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Mary E Charlton; Lorren R Mattingly-Wells; Jorge E Marcet; Brenna C McMahon Waldschmidt; John W Cromwell Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-06-08 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Gianni Mezzi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Silvia Carrara; Francesco Perri; Maria Chiara Petrone; Francesco De Cobelli; Simone Gusmini; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Pier Alberto Testoni Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Peter Kienle; Moritz Koch; Frank Autschbach; Axel Benner; Martina Treiber; Michael Wannenmacher; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Markus Büchler; Christian Herfarth; Jürgen Weitz Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 12.969