Literature DB >> 10027354

Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.

A G Heriot1, A Grundy, D Kumar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including local excision, total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiotherapy, has increased the importance of accurate preoperative staging to allow the optimum treatment to be selected.
METHODS: A literature review was undertaken of methods of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma and the evidence for each was evaluated critically.
RESULTS: Clinical assessment of rectal carcinoma may give an indication of fixity but is not accurate for staging. Endoanal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radioimmunoscintigraphy and positron emission tomography have all been used for staging. The extent of tumour spread through the bowel wall (T stage) is most accurately assessed by endoanal ultrasonography, although this technique is poor at assessing tumour extension into adjacent organs for which both CT and MRI are more accurate. No method accurately determines lymph node involvement, but endoanal ultrasonography is the best available. Liver metastases may be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography, CT, MRI and CT portography (with increasing sensitivity and cost in that order).
CONCLUSION: Endoanal ultrasonography is the most effective method of local tumour staging, with the addition of either CT or MRI if adjacent organ involvement is suspected. Abdominal ultrasonography or CT is recommended for routine preoperative assessment of the liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10027354     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00996.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of CT and MRI for presurgical characterization of paraaortic lymph nodes in patients with pancreatico-biliary carcinoma.

Authors:  Young-Chul Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Seung-Whan Cha; Yong-Eun Chung; Joon-Suk Lim; Kyung-Sik Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Ki-Whang Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Reliability of (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the nodal staging of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Hee Jung Yi; Kyung Sook Hong; Nara Moon; Soon Sup Chung; Ryung-Ah Lee; Kwang Ho Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-12-31

3.  The investigation of primary rectal cancer by surgeons: current pattern of practice.

Authors:  Todd P W McMullen; Alexandra M Easson; Zane Cohen; Carol J Swallow
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Paul Hermanek; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Claus Rödel; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  James S Wu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

6.  Role of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; N Fusco; P Broccoli; M Maurici; M Yamgoue; R Danieli; S D'Urso; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Association between surgeon characteristics and their preferences for guideline-concordant staging and treatment for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Lorren R Mattingly-Wells; Jorge E Marcet; Brenna C McMahon Waldschmidt; John W Cromwell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for re-staging rectal cancer after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gianni Mezzi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Silvia Carrara; Francesco Perri; Maria Chiara Petrone; Francesco De Cobelli; Simone Gusmini; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Pier Alberto Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Y Nancy You; Nancy N Baxter; Andrew Stewart; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Decreased detection rate of disseminated tumor cells of rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation: a first step towards a molecular surrogate marker for neoadjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Peter Kienle; Moritz Koch; Frank Autschbach; Axel Benner; Martina Treiber; Michael Wannenmacher; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Markus Büchler; Christian Herfarth; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.