Literature DB >> 18407595

Comparison of CT and MRI for presurgical characterization of paraaortic lymph nodes in patients with pancreatico-biliary carcinoma.

Young-Chul Kim1, Mi-Suk Park, Seung-Whan Cha, Yong-Eun Chung, Joon-Suk Lim, Kyung-Sik Kim, Myeong-Jin Kim, Ki-Whang Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) for presurgical characterization of paraaortic lymph nodes in patients with pancreatico-biliary carcinoma.
METHODS: Two radiologists independently evaluated CT and MR imaging of 31 patients who had undergone lymphadenectomy (9 metastatic and 22 non-metastatic paraaortic nodes). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using a five point scale to compare CT with MRI. To re-define the morphologic features of metastatic nodes, we evaluated CT scans from 70 patients with 23 metastatic paraaortic nodes and 47 non-metastatic ones. The short axis diameter, ratio of the short to long axis, shape, and presence of necrosis were compared between metastatic and non-metastatic nodes by independent samples t-test and Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The mean area under the ROC curve for CT (0.732 and 0.646, respectively) was slightly higher than that for MRI (0.725 and 0.598, respectively) without statistical significance (P = 0.940 and 0.716, respectively). The short axis diameter of the metastatic lymph nodes (mean = 9.2 mm) was significantly larger than that of non-metastatic ones (mean = 5.17 mm, P < 0.05). Metastatic nodes had more irregular margins (44.4%) and central necrosis (22.2%) than non-metastatic ones (9% and 0%, respectively), with statistical significance (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of CT scan for the characterization of paraaortic nodes is not different from that of MRI. A short axis-diameter (> 5.3 mm), irregular margin, and presence of central necrosis are the suggestive morphologic features of metastatic paraaortic nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18407595      PMCID: PMC2703846          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.2208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

Review 1.  Role of diagnostic imaging in abdominal lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  A M De Gaetano; A Vecchioli; L M Minordi; A Parrella; S Gaudino; G Masselli; G Savino
Journal:  Rays       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec

2.  [Value of paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gallbladder carcinoma].

Authors:  S Kondo; Y Nimura; N Hayakawa; J Kamiya; M Nagino; M Kanai; K Uesaka; N Yuasa; T Sano
Journal:  Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1998-10

Review 3.  Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer--computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L Blomqvist
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.360

4.  Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  W T Yang; W W Lam; M Y Yu; T H Cheung; C Metreweli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  [Surgical strategy based on the spread mode of gallbladder carcinoma].

Authors:  Kohji Miyazaki
Journal:  Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2005-04

Review 6.  Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  N Alexakis; C Halloran; M Raraty; P Ghaneh; R Sutton; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Spread of gallbladder carcinoma: CT evaluation with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  T Ohtani; Y Shirai; K Tsukada; T Muto; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 May-Jun

8.  Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takanori Yoshida; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Atsushi Sasaki; Kohei Shibata; Masanori Aramaki; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Matsuoka; Akihisa Nakamura; Tadahiko Masaki; Masanori Sugiyama; Taro Takahara; Junichi Hachiya; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Reinhold Függer; Ewald Schober; Claudia Oettl; Peter Wamser; Florian Grabenwöger; J Mark Ryan; Gottfried Novacek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Kiichi Tamada; Jun Ushio; Kentaro Sugano
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

2.  Preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in biliary and pancreatic carcinomas: evaluation of the combination of multi-detector CT and serum CA19-9 level.

Authors:  Atsushi Nanashima; Ichiro Sakamoto; Tomayoshi Hayashi; Syuuichi Tobinaga; Masato Araki; Masaki Kunizaki; Takashi Nonaka; Hiroaki Takeshita; Shigekazu Hidaka; Terumitsu Sawai; Toru Yasutake; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Preoperative defining system for pancreatic head cancer considering surgical resection.

Authors:  Seok Jeong Yang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies: CT vs PET.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Mi Jin Yun; Mi-Suk Park; Seung Hwan Cha; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jong Doo Lee; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The Role of CT in Assessment of Extraregional Lymph Node Involvement in Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Dorine S J Tseng; Bobby K Pranger; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Jan Pieter Pennings; Lodewijk A Brosens; Nadja Haj Mohammad; Vincent E de Meijer; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Joris I Erdmann; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-03-19

6.  Evaluation of the 8th Edition AJCC Staging System for the Clinical Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Huapyong Kang; Seung-Seob Kim; Min Je Sung; Jung Hyun Jo; Hee Seung Lee; Moon Jae Chung; Jeong Youp Park; Seung Woo Park; Si Young Song; Mi-Suk Park; Seungmin Bang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) overexpression predicts the prognosis and pN2 in pancreatic head carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Shiduo Song; Dechun Li; Songbing He; Bing Zhang; Zhenxin Wang; Xinguo Zhu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.