Literature DB >> 15448986

Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women--the HUNT Study, Norway.

Siri Forsmo1, Arnulf Langhammer, Lisa Forsen, Berit Schei.   

Abstract

The fracture incidence in Norway is among the highest in Europe, presumably due to osteoporosis. As part of a multipurpose health study in the county of Nord-Trondelag, Norway (the HUNT study), a 5% randomly selected sample (n=4,646) of the population >19 years of age was invited to undergo single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) of the forearm. A total of 1,274 men (50.5 years) and 1,505 women (49.9 years) participated (60%). The aim of the study was to describe the variation in bone mineral density (BMD) and the prevalence of forearm BMD 2.5 standard deviations (SD) below the mean value for young adults in an unselected population sample. In women the BMD remained stable until the age of 50 years, whereupon a strong decline in BMD was observed. In men, a BMD increase was observed until about the age of 40 years; the decline after the age of 65 was, however, similar to that in women. Based on age and gender-specific reference values, the age-adjusted prevalence of T-scores <-2.5 SD in women and men aged 50-69 years was 16.0% and 5.6%, respectively. In the age group of 70 years or older the prevalence was 65.8% and 30.6% for women and men, respectively. The accelerated BMD reduction in women aged 50-65 explains the higher prevalence of T-score <-2.5 SD in elderly women than in men. Further studies on bone loss and falls are required to explain the high fracture incidence in Norway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15448986     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1726-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  40 in total

Review 1.  Who has osteoporosis? A conflict between clinical and public health perspectives.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Bone dimensional change with age: interactions of genetic, hormonal, and body size variables.

Authors:  R P Heaney; M J Barger-Lux; K M Davies; R A Ryan; M L Johnson; G Gong
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The fallacy of BMD: a critical review of the diagnostic use of dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  S P Nielsen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Bone mineral density in adolescents. Higher values in a rural area--a population-based study of 246 subjects in southern Sweden.

Authors:  M Sundberg; H Düppe; P Gärdsell; O Johnell; E Ornstein; I Sernbo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-10

5.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of pre- and postmenopausal bone loss with a portable forearm X-ray device: the Ofely study.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; E Sornay-Rendu; P Garnero; A Bourgeaud-Lignot; P D Delmas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Cross-sectional versus longitudinal evaluation of bone loss in men and women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S Khosla; E J Atkinson; M K Oconnor; W M Ofallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; B Jonsson; C De Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis?

Authors:  A I Ahmed; G M Blake; J M Rymer; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: a review.

Authors:  P Augat; T Fuerst; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  6 in total

1.  Excess mortality after hip fracture among elderly women in Norway. The HUNT study.

Authors:  A B Grønskag; P Romundstad; S Forsmo; A Langhammer; B Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effects of the sample size of reference population on determining BMD reference curve and peak BMD and diagnosing osteoporosis.

Authors:  Y-L Hou; E-Y Liao; X-P Wu; Y-Q Peng; H Zhang; R-C Dai; X-H Luo; X-Z Cao
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Height loss, forearm bone density and bone loss in menopausal women: a 15-year prospective study. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway.

Authors:  S Forsmo; H M Hvam; M L Rea; S E Lilleeng; B Schei; A Langhammer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in a Korean population: reference data and relationship to bone mineral density determined by peripheral dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Min-Ho Shin; Sun-Seog Kweon; Kyeong-Soo Park; Heon Heo; Seung-joon Kim; Hae-Sung Nam; Seul-Ki Jeong; Eun-Kyung Chung; Jin-Su Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Weight loss and distal forearm fractures in postmenopausal women: the Nord-Trøndelag health study, Norway.

Authors:  T K Omsland; B Schei; A B Grønskag; A Langhammer; L Forsén; C G Gjesdal; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone mineral density and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women: the HUNT study.

Authors:  Laxmi Bhatta; Aivaras Cepelis; Sigrid A Vikjord; Vegard Malmo; Lars E Laugsand; Håvard Dalen; Arnulf Langhammer; Imre Janszky; Linn B Strand; Ben M Brumpton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.082

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.