Literature DB >> 9989439

Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited?

S Corna1, J Tarantola, A Nardone, A Giordano, M Schieppati.   

Abstract

We describe the characteristics of displacement of the head and hip in normal young subjects standing on a moving platform undergoing continuous sinusoidal horizontal translation in the antero-posterior direction, at frequencies ranging from 0.1-1 Hz. The head, hip and malleolus were marked by light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and the displacement of each LED was quantified by (1) the measure of the shift during each cycle of translation, (2) the standard deviation (SD) of the path travelled during the whole trial, (3) the power spectrum (PS) of the signal and (4) the cross-correlation (CC) between pairs of LED signals. At each frequency of translation, with eyes open (EO), the displacement of head was smaller than that of hip, and the displacement of hip was smaller than that of malleolus. With eyes closed (EC), this order was reversed. The peak value of the CC functions of the pairs malleolus/head, malleolus/hip and hip/head decreased by passing from low to high frequency of translation, under both visual conditions, and decreased more for the pair malleolus/head than malleolus/hip. The lags between body segment displacements ranged between 30 ms and 150 ms, on average, the former segment of each pair preceding the latter. The fast Fourier transformation of hip and head displacement showed a power spectrum peak at the frequency imposed by the platform translation. The peak was larger with EC than EO. With EC, another peak appeared at 0.2 Hz, possibly corresponding to the respiratory frequency. We conclude that, when vision was allowed, subjects behaved as a non-rigid, noninverted pendulum, and stabilised head in space. When vision was denied, head oscillated more than the platform, especially at low translation frequencies. Therefore, the strategy of balance control shifted from a pendulum to an inverted-pendulum behaviour, passing from active head-and-trunk control to maximal body compliance to the perturbation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9989439     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Persistence in postural dynamics is dependent on constraints of vision, postural orientation, and the temporal structure of support surface translations.

Authors:  Troy J Rand; Venkata Naga Pradeep Ambati; Mukul Mukherjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory information for postural control: sway-referencing gain shapes center of pressure variability and temporal dynamics.

Authors:  Sean Clark; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; J S Frank; F Allard; J J Buchanan; A R Oates; F B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The contribution of mechanoreceptive sensation on stability and adaptation in the young and elderly.

Authors:  Mitesh Patel; Mans Magnusson; Ella Kristinsdottir; Per-Anders Fransson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Decreased postural control in adolescents born with extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Hannes Petersen; Arnar-Thor Tulinius; Ingibjörg Georgsdóttir; Einar-Jon Einarsson; Mitesh Patel; Ásgeir Haraldsson; Per-Anders Fransson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Aging does not affect generalized postural motor learning in response to variable amplitude oscillations of the support surface.

Authors:  Karen Van Ooteghem; James S Frank; Fran Allard; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Transitions in persistence of postural dynamics depend on the velocity and structure of postural perturbations.

Authors:  Troy J Rand; Mukul Mukherjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Kinematics and postural muscular activity during continuous oscillating platform movement in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Richard S Mills; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.