Literature DB >> 19237420

Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries.

Gunter P Siegmund1, Jean-Sébastien Blouin.   

Abstract

Recent studies have proposed that a high rate of acceleration onset, i.e. high jerk, during a low-speed vehicle collision increases the risk of whiplash injury by triggering inappropriate muscle responses and/or increasing peak head acceleration. Our goal was to test these proposed mechanisms at realistic jerk levels and then to determine how collision jerk affects the potential for whiplash injuries. Twenty-three seated volunteers (8 F, 15 M) were exposed to multiple experiments involving perturbations simulating the onset of a vehicle collision in eyes open and eyes closed conditions. In the first experiment, subjects experienced five forward and five rearward perturbations to look for the inappropriate muscle responses and 'floppy' head kinematics previously attributed to high jerk perturbations. In the second experiment, we independently varied the jerk ( approximately 125 to 3 000 m s(-3)) and acceleration ( approximately 0.65 to 2.6 g) of the perturbation to assess their effect on the electromyographic (EMG) responses of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (SCAL) and cervical paraspinal (PARA) muscles and the kinematic responses of the head and neck. In the first experiment, we found neither inappropriate muscle responses nor floppy head kinematics when subjects had their eyes open, but observed two subjects with floppy head kinematics with eyes closed. In the second experiment, we found that about 70% of the variations in the SCM and SCAL responses and about 95% of the variations in head/neck kinematics were explained by changes in perturbation acceleration in both the eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Less than 2% of the variation in the muscle and kinematic responses was explained by changes in perturbation jerk and, where significant, response amplitudes diminished with increasing jerk. Based on these findings, collision jerk appears to have little or no role in the genesis of whiplash injuries in low-speed vehicle crashes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19237420      PMCID: PMC2683968          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  34 in total

1.  Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact.

Authors:  M L Magnusson; M H Pope; L Hasselquist; K M Bolte; M Ross; V K Goel; J S Lee; K Spratt; C R Clark; D G Wilder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The rate of change of acceleration: implications to head kinematics during rear-end impacts.

Authors:  Loriann M Hynes; James P Dickey
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2007-12-31

3.  Postural adjustments in sitting humans following external perturbations: muscle activity and kinematics.

Authors:  H Forssberg; H Hirschfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control of the head in response to tilt of the body in normal and labyrinthine-defective human subjects.

Authors:  T Kanaya; M A Gresty; A M Bronstein; D Buckwell; B Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Facet joint kinematics and injury mechanisms during simulated whiplash.

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Paul C Ivancic; Shigeki Ito; Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Some observations on whiplash injuries.

Authors:  R W Evans
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Visual, vestibular and voluntary contributions to human head stabilization.

Authors:  D Guitton; R E Kearney; N Wereley; B W Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Gender- and region-dependent local facet joint kinematics in rear impact: implications in whiplash injury.

Authors:  Brian D Stemper; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Injury of the anterior longitudinal ligament during whiplash simulation.

Authors:  P C Ivancic; A M Pearson; M M Panjabi; S Ito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Are cervical multifidus muscles active during whiplash and startle? An initial experimental study.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter; John R Brault; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neck muscle responses of driver and front seat passenger during frontal-oblique collisions.

Authors:  Andreas Mühlbeier; Kim Joris Boström; Wolfram Kalthoff; Marc H E de Lussanet; Cassandra Kraaijenbrink; Lena Hagenfeld; William H M Castro; Heiko Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The role of acceleration and jerk in perception of above-threshold surge motion.

Authors:  Ksander N de Winkel; Florian Soyka; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.