Literature DB >> 17013618

Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform.

Alessandro Marco De Nunzio1, Marco Schieppati.   

Abstract

While balancing on a continuously antero-posterior (A-P) translating platform (10 cm, 0.5 Hz), the head normally oscillates with the platform without vision but is stabilized in space with vision. We estimated the time to shift from one to the other balancing behaviour when visual condition changed at some stage during the balancing trials. Ten subjects performed randomly 50 balancing trials (each lasting 18 s): 10 trials with eyes open (EO), 10 with eyes closed (EC), 15 in which participants started with EO and closed their eyes (condition EO-->EC) in response to an acoustic signal delivered during the trial, and 15 starting with EC and closing their eyes (EC-->EO) in response to the same signal. No other specific instruction was given. Displacements of malleolus, hip and head, and EMG from leg and axial muscles were recorded. Indexes of amplitude of A-P head and hip oscillation and of amplitude of EMG activity were computed. All variables were larger with EC than EO. On changing visual condition during the trial, the pattern of head and hip movement and of muscle activity turned into that appropriate for the new visual condition in a time-interval ranging from about 1 to 2.5 s. For each subject, the mean latency of the change in the balancing behaviour was assessed by statistical methods. On average, the latencies of kinematics and EMG changes proved to be longer for the EO-->EC condition than vice versa. Further, the latencies of the changes were also measured across all EO-->EC and EC-->EO individual trials. These values were clustered around particular epochs of the first few oscillation cycles following the shift in visual condition. The results show that subjects can rapidly adapt their balancing behaviour to the new visual condition. However, they appear to refrain from releasing the new behaviour were this unfit, and unfastened it at appropriate time in the next platform translation cycle. These findings reveal the temporal and spatial features of the automatic release of the new balancing strategy in response to a shift in the ongoing sensory set, and emphasize the swiftness in the change in balancing behaviour when subjects pass from a non-visual to a visual reference frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013618     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0708-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

1.  Variability in a dynamic postural task attests ample flexibility in balance control mechanisms.

Authors:  Marco Schieppati; Andrea Giordano; Antonio Nardone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Body sway stabilization in human posture.

Authors:  M Kleiber; G A Horstmann; V Dietz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Trunk muscle proprioceptive input assists steering of locomotion.

Authors:  Micaela Schmid; Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005 Aug 12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment.

Authors:  T M Dijkstra; G Schöner; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects.

Authors:  W M Paulus; A Straube; T Brandt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Postural coordination in elderly subjects standing on a periodically moving platform.

Authors:  A Nardone; M Grasso; J Tarantola; S Corna; M Schieppati
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  11 in total

1.  Body sway adaptation to addition but not withdrawal of stabilizing visual information is delayed by a concurrent cognitive task.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Biofeedback rehabilitation of posture and weightbearing distribution in stroke: a center of foot pressure analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Chiara Zucchella; Francesca Spicciato; Paolo Tortola; Carmine Vecchione; Francesco Pierelli; Michaelangelo Bartolo
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

3.  Kinematics and postural muscular activity during continuous oscillating platform movement in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Richard S Mills; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Post-effect of forward and backward locomotion on body orientation in space during quiet stance.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Carlo Zanetti; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Time-interval for integration of stabilizing haptic and visual information in subjects balancing under static and dynamic conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06

6.  Haptic Cues for Balance: Use of a Cane Provides Immediate Body Stabilization.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head-Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction.

Authors:  Rami Mooti; Hangue Park
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Independent walking as a major skill for the development of anticipatory postural control: evidence from adjustments to predictable perturbations.

Authors:  Fabien Cignetti; Milan Zedka; Marianne Vaugoyeau; Christine Assaiante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Calibration of the Leg Muscle Responses Elicited by Predictable Perturbations of Stance and the Effect of Vision.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.