Literature DB >> 9987466

Can data-driven benchmarks be used to set the goals of healthy people 2010?

J Allison1, C I Kiefe, N W Weissman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Expert panels determined the public health goals of Healthy People 2000 subjectively. The present study examined whether data-driven benchmarks provide a better alternative.
METHODS: We developed the "pared-mean" method to define from data the best achievable health care practices. We calculated the pared-mean benchmark for screening mammography from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey, using the metropolitan statistical area as the "provider" unit. Beginning with the best-performing provider and adding providers in descending sequence, we established the minimum provider subset that included at least 10% of all women surveyed on this question. The pared-mean benchmark is then the proportion of women in this subset who received mammography.
RESULTS: The pared-mean benchmark for screening mammography was 71%, compared with the Healthy People 2000 goal of 60%.
CONCLUSIONS: For Healthy People 2010, benchmarks derived from data reflecting the best available care provide viable alternatives to consensus-derived targets. We are currently pursuing additional refinements to the data-driven pared-mean benchmark approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9987466      PMCID: PMC1508488          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.1.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  35 in total

Review 1.  Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments.

Authors:  S H Woolf
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-09

2.  Healthy people 2000.

Authors:  L W Sullivan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  "Healthy People 2000": an overview of the national health promotion and disease prevention objectives.

Authors:  J O Mason; J M McGinnis
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines.

Authors:  S H Woolf
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

5.  Appropriateness of care. A comparison of global and outcome methods to set standards.

Authors:  M McClellan; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Practice policies: where do they come from?

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit approach.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

Authors:  A Fink; J Kosecoff; M Chassin; R H Brook
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Consensus statements.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Smoking prevalence in 2010: why the healthy people goal is unattainable.

Authors:  D Mendez; K E Warner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Keeping "in touch" with women and children: maternal and child health model indicators.

Authors:  W M Sappenfield; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-12

3.  The association of job demands and resources with burnout among emergency medical services professionals.

Authors:  Remle P Crowe; Antonio R Fernandez; Paul E Pepe; Rebecca E Cash; Madison K Rivard; Robert Wronski; Sarah E Anderson; Tory H Hogan; Rebecca R Andridge; Ashish R Panchal; Amy K Ferketich
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-01-27

4.  Projection scenarios of body mass index (2013-2030) for Public Health Planning in Quebec.

Authors:  Ernest Lo; Denis Hamel; Yun Jen; Patricia Lamontagne; Sylvie Martel; Colin Steensma; Chantal Blouin; Russell Steele
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Extracting physician group intelligence from electronic health records to support evidence based medicine.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians.

Authors:  Alan David Kaye; Olutoyin J Okanlawon; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-05-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.