Literature DB >> 9952307

Comparison of breast cancer incidence in the Massachusetts tuberculosis fluoroscopy cohort and in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

M P Little1, J D Boice.   

Abstract

Breast cancer has occurred in excess among women exposed briefly to atomic bomb radiation and among those exposed repeatedly over many years to medical radiation for tuberculosis (TB). The excess relative risk of breast cancer incidence in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors, however, is significantly higher (two-sided P = 0.04) than that in the Massachusetts TB fluoroscopy patients. The best estimate of the ratio between the excess relative risk coefficients for the Japanese and Massachusetts cohorts is 2.11 (95% CI 1.05, 4.95). However, this higher relative excess risk is attributable to the lower baseline risk of breast cancer among Japanese women compared with the Massachusetts women, and the excess absolute breast cancer risks in the two data sets are statistically indistinguishable (two-sided P = 0.32). The best estimate of the ratio between the excess absolute risk coefficients among Japanese and Massachusetts women is 0.73 (95% CI 0.41, 1.44). After childhood exposures, an early onset of radiation-induced breast cancer was seen among Japanese atomic bomb survivors but not among the Massachusetts women. There are some indications (two-sided P = 0.04) of differences in the patterns of risk over time since exposure between these groups exposed in childhood. However, in general there are no marked differences between the Massachusetts and Japanese data sets in the age and time distribution of risk of radiation-induced breast cancer. These data provide little evidence for a reduction of breast cancer risk after fractionated irradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9952307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  20 in total

Review 1.  Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Circulatory disease mortality in the Massachusetts tuberculosis fluoroscopy cohort study.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Lydia B Zablotska; Alina V Brenner; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Are cancer risks associated with exposures to ionising radiation from internal emitters greater than those in the Japanese A-bomb survivors?

Authors:  Mark P Little; Per Hall; Monty W Charles
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  J Leslie Redpath
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Variation in the risk of radiation-related contralateral breast cancer by histology and estrogen receptor expression in SEER.

Authors:  Gila Neta; William F Anderson; Ethel Gilbert; Amy Berrington
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  How is the risk of radiation-induced cancer influenced by background risk factors? Invited commentary on "a method for determining weights for excess relative risk and excess absolute risk when applied in the calculation of lifetime risk of cancer from radiation exposure" by Walsh and Schneider (2012).

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Stem cells in mammary development and carcinogenesis: implications for prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Gabriela Dontu; Suling Liu; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  A method for determining weights for excess relative risk and excess absolute risk when applied in the calculation of lifetime risk of cancer from radiation exposure.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.