Literature DB >> 9952237

Portohepatic gradient and portal hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection.

A Deplano1, V Migaleddu, A Pischedda, G Garrucciu, G Gregu, C Multinu, M Piredda, A Tocco, F Urigo, P A Cossu, A Solinas.   

Abstract

We evaluated the agreement between wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP), portal vein pressure (PVP), and its relationship with portal hemodynamics in 21 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis with esophageal varices. Direct measurements of the portohepatic gradient (HVPG) were obtained by ultrasound-guided fine needle puncture of the right hepatic and the portal veins. In five cases PVP was 6.4-10.4 mm Hg higher than WHVP. In 12 cases measurements were similar (WHVP - PVP < or = 3 mm Hg). In the remaining four cases WHVP was 3.6-9.6 mm Hg higher than PVP. WHVP and PVP agreement was not related to HVPG mean value, Child-Pugh score, or grading of esophageal varices. By contrast, the difference between WHVP and PVP was inversely related to the portal flow velocity (P = 0.053) and directly related to the portal vascular resistance (P = 0.02). Whereas the portal branches were visualized in patients with WHVP lower or similar to PVP, a predominant left portosystemic collateral flow was observed in patients with WHVP > PVP. Our data point out that, in patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection, discrepant HVPG values reflect true hemodynamic differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9952237     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026622721389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  24 in total

1.  Measurement of normal portal venous blood flow by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  H S Brown; M Halliwell; M Qamar; A E Read; J M Evans; P N Wells
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Observer variability in echo-Doppler measurements of portal flow in cirrhotic patients and normal volunteers.

Authors:  C Sabbá; G G Weltin; D V Cicchetti; G Ferraioli; K J Taylor; T Nakamura; F Moriyasu; R J Groszmann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Endoscopic classification of gastric varices.

Authors:  M Hashizume; S Kitano; H Yamaga; N Koyanagi; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  [Chronic hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients and spontaneous portacaval anastomosis. Portal angiographic and manometric study].

Authors:  P Bauret; D Mirouze; P Bories; C Mourrut; J M Bruel; H Michel
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1989

5.  "Congestion index" of the portal vein.

Authors:  F Moriyasu; O Nishida; N Ban; T Nakamura; M Sakai; T Miyake; H Uchino
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage.

Authors:  R J Groszmann; J Bosch; N D Grace; H O Conn; G Garcia-Tsao; M Navasa; J Alberts; J Rodes; R Fischer; M Bermann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Comparison between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis.

Authors:  H C Lin; Y T Tsai; F Y Lee; T T Chang; S S Wang; C S Lay; S D Lee; K J Lo
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Prognostic usefulness of hepatic vein catheterization in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices.

Authors:  C Merkel; M Bolognesi; S Bellon; R Zuin; F Noventa; G Finucci; D Sacerdoti; P Angeli; A Gatta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Measurement of portal vascular resistance in patients with portal hypertension.

Authors:  F Moriyasu; O Nishida; N Ban; T Nakamura; K Miura; M Sakai; T Miyake; H Uchino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of therapeutic benefit of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: is hepatic venous pressure gradient a better end point?

Authors:  A K Burroughs; R Groszmann; J Bosch; N Grace; G Garcia-Tsao; D Patch; J C Garcia-Pagan; L Dagher
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Cognitive dysfunction and hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Antonio Solinas; Maria Rita Piras; Angelo Deplano
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-08

3.  Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update.

Authors:  Gamal Shiha; Alaa Ibrahim; Ahmed Helmy; Shiv Kumar Sarin; Masao Omata; Ashish Kumar; David Bernstien; Hitushi Maruyama; Vivek Saraswat; Yogesh Chawla; Saeed Hamid; Zaigham Abbas; Pierre Bedossa; Puja Sakhuja; Mamun Elmahatab; Seng Gee Lim; Laurentius Lesmana; Jose Sollano; Ji-Dong Jia; Bahaa Abbas; Ashraf Omar; Barjesh Sharma; Diana Payawal; Ahmed Abdallah; Abdelhamid Serwah; Abdelkhalek Hamed; Aly Elsayed; Amany AbdelMaqsod; Tarek Hassanein; Ahmed Ihab; Hamsik GHaziuan; Nizar Zein; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study.

Authors:  Jason Y Huang; Jason B Samarasena; Takeshi Tsujino; John Lee; Ke-Qin Hu; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Wedged hepatic venous pressure does not reflect portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic veno-venous communications.

Authors:  Yuji Osada; Hidenori Kanazawa; Yoshiyuki Narahara; Yasutaka Mamiya; Katsuhisa Nakatsuka; Choitsu Sakamoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.