Literature DB >> 27714681

Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update.

Gamal Shiha1,2, Alaa Ibrahim3, Ahmed Helmy4, Shiv Kumar Sarin5, Masao Omata6, Ashish Kumar7, David Bernstien8, Hitushi Maruyama9, Vivek Saraswat10, Yogesh Chawla11, Saeed Hamid12, Zaigham Abbas13, Pierre Bedossa14, Puja Sakhuja15, Mamun Elmahatab16, Seng Gee Lim17, Laurentius Lesmana18, Jose Sollano19, Ji-Dong Jia20, Bahaa Abbas21, Ashraf Omar22, Barjesh Sharma23, Diana Payawal24, Ahmed Abdallah25, Abdelhamid Serwah26, Abdelkhalek Hamed27, Aly Elsayed28, Amany AbdelMaqsod29, Tarek Hassanein30, Ahmed Ihab31, Hamsik GHaziuan32, Nizar Zein33, Manoj Kumar5.   

Abstract

Hepatic fibrosis is a common pathway leading to liver cirrhosis, which is the end result of any injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Despite the fact that liver biopsy (LB) has been considered the "gold standard" of assessment of hepatic fibrosis, LB is not favored by patients or physicians owing to its invasiveness, limitations, sampling errors, etc. Therefore, many alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis are gaining more popularity and have assumed great importance, and many data on such approaches are being generated. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The first consensus guidelines of the APASL recommendations on hepatic fibrosis were published in 2009. Due to advances in the field, we present herein the APASL 2016 updated version on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved review of all available published literature by a core group of experts who subsequently proposed consensus statements followed by discussion of the contentious issues and unanimous approval of the consensus statements. The Oxford System of the evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from one (highest) to five (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The topics covered in the guidelines include invasive methods (LB and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements), blood tests, conventional radiological methods, elastography techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatic fibrosis assessment methods, in addition to fibrosis assessment in special and rare situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic liver disease; Cirrhosis; Graft fibrosis; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; Invasive assessment, non-invasive assessment; Liver fibrosis; Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27714681     DOI: 10.1007/s12072-016-9760-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Int        ISSN: 1936-0533            Impact factor:   6.047


  181 in total

1.  Intrahepatic heterogeneity of hepatic venous pressure gradient in human cirrhosis again.

Authors:  S Keiding; H Vilstrup
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.

Authors:  Francesco Vizzutti; Umberto Arena; Roberto G Romanelli; Luigi Rega; Marco Foschi; Stefano Colagrande; Antonio Petrarca; Stefania Moscarella; Giacomo Belli; Anna Linda Zignego; Fabio Marra; Giacomo Laffi; Massimo Pinzani
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis using ARFI with pathological correlation, a prospective study.

Authors:  Wan Wan Yap; Rathy Kirke; Eric M Yoshida; David Owen; Alison C Harris
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.400

4.  Percutaneous drainage compared with surgery for hepatic hydatid cysts.

Authors:  M S Khuroo; N A Wani; G Javid; B A Khan; G N Yattoo; A H Shah; S G Jeelani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Increased liver stiffness in alcoholic liver disease: differentiating fibrosis from steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Sebastian Mueller; Gunda Millonig; Lucie Sarovska; Stefanie Friedrich; Frank M Reimann; Maria Pritsch; Silke Eisele; Felix Stickel; Thomas Longerich; Peter Schirmacher; Helmut Karl Seitz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  TIMP-1/-2 and transient elastography allow non invasive diagnosis of cystic fibrosis associated liver disease.

Authors:  Timo Rath; Katrin Menendez Menendez; Marion Kügler; Lisa Hage; Christian Wenzel; Richard Schulz; Jürgen Graf; Lutz Nährlich; Elke Roeb; Martin Roderfeld
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 7.  Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis: serum markers, imaging, and other modalities.

Authors:  I N Guha; W M Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.126

8.  Quantitative US attenuation in normal liver and in patients with diffuse liver disease: importance of fat.

Authors:  K J Taylor; C A Riely; L Hammers; S Flax; G Weltin; G Garcia-Tsao; H O Conn; R Kuc; K W Barwick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Cutoff values for alcoholic liver fibrosis using magnetic resonance elastography technique.

Authors:  Sabine F Bensamoun; Gwladys E Leclerc; Laëtitia Debernard; Xiaobin Cheng; Ludovic Robert; Fabrice Charleux; Colette Rhein; Jean-Paul Latrive
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Acoustic radiation force impulse and supersonic shear imaging versus transient elastography for liver fibrosis assessment.

Authors:  Ioan Sporea; Simona Bota; Ana Jurchis; Roxana Sirli; Oana Grădinaru-Tascău; Alina Popescu; Iulia Ratiu; Milana Szilaski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  58 in total

1.  Precise fibrosis staging with shear wave elastography in chronic hepatitis B depends on liver inflammation and steatosis.

Authors:  Junzhao Ye; Wei Wang; Shiting Feng; Yang Huang; Xianhua Liao; Ming Kuang; Xiaoyan Xie; Bing Liao; Bihui Zhong
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Can Transient Elastography Predict Fibrosis Regression in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B During Long-Term Antiviral Therapy?

Authors:  Rui Huang; Xiaomin Yan; Yong Liu; Zhaoping Zhang; Chao Wu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio outweigh fibrosis index based on four factors and red cell distribution width-platelet ratio in diagnosing liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Wu; Bei Cai; Zhenzhen Su; Yamei Li; Jin Xu; Rong Deng; Lanlan Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 4.  Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines.

Authors:  Kyoji Ito; Nobuyuki Takemura; Fuyuki Inagaki; Fuminori Mihara; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2020-10-31

5.  Non-invasive aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index correlates well with invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Vijendra Kirnake; Anil Arora; Praveen Sharma; Mohan Goyal; Romesh Chawlani; Jay Toshniwal; Ashish Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-03

6.  Validation and Refinement of Noninvasive Methods to Assess Hepatic Fibrosis: Magnetic Resonance Elastography Versus Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Index.

Authors:  Kenneth E Sherman; Enass A Abdel-Hameed; Richard L Ehman; Susan D Rouster; Adriana Campa; Sabrina Sales Martinez; Yongjun Huang; Gustavo G Zarini; Jacqueline Hernandez; Colby Teeman; Javier Tamargo; Qingyun Liu; Raul Mandler; Marianna K Baum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Diagnostic value of MRI-derived liver surface nodularity score for the non-invasive quantification of hepatic fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Roberta Catania; Alessandro Furlan; Andrew D Smith; Jaideep Behari; Mitchell E Tublin; Amir A Borhani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Application of new ultrasound techniques for focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Feiqian Wang; Kazushi Numata; Hiromi Nihonmatsu; Masahiro Okada; Shin Maeda
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 9.  Issues to be considered to address the future liver remnant prior to major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yoji Kishi; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  INASL Position Statements on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in India: The Andaman Statements.

Authors:  Anil Arora; Shivaram P Singh; Ashish Kumar; Vivek A Saraswat; Rakesh Aggarwal; Manisha Bangar; Pradip Bhaumik; Harshad Devarbhavi; Radha K Dhiman; Vinod K Dixit; Ashish Goel; Bhabadev Goswami; Dharmesh Kapoor; Kaushal Madan; Jimmy Narayan; Sandeep Nijhawan; Gaurav Pandey; Ramesh R Rai; Manoj K Sahu; Neeraj Saraf; Thrivikrama Shenoy; Varghese Thomas; Manav Wadhawan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.