Literature DB >> 9949742

Who should be offered prenatal diagnosis? The 35-year-old question.

M Kuppermann1, J D Goldberg, R F Nease, A E Washington.   

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal disorders is generally offered to women who will be 35 years or older at the time of delivery or who have been determined via serum screening to be at risk similar to that of a woman older than 35 years. This age threshold was based on 4 major rationales that reflect considerations of resources and effectiveness. In this paper, we explore the current screening recommendations and consider new information that calls the 35-years threshold into question. We conclude that guidelines regarding use of prenatal diagnosis account for the preferences of the individual patient as well as for individual risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9949742      PMCID: PMC1508524          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  A survey of mongoloid births in Victoria, Australia, 1942-1957.

Authors:  R D COLLMANN; A STOLLER
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1962-05

2.  Estimated rates of Down syndrome in live births by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20-49 in a New York State study-implications of the risk figures for genetic counseling and cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs.

Authors:  E B Hook; G M Chambers
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1977

3.  Prenatal diagnosis availability.

Authors:  M S Golbus
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-04-01

4.  Use and misuse of the term "cost effective" in medicine.

Authors:  P Doubilet; M C Weinstein; B J McNeil
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women.

Authors:  A Tabor; J Philip; M Madsen; J Bang; E B Obel; B Nørgaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Intrauterine diagnosis and management of genetic defects.

Authors:  C B Jacobson; R H Barter
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1967-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Genetic triage and genetic counseling.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-02

8.  Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening.

Authors:  J E Haddow; G E Palomaki; G J Knight; G C Cunningham; L S Lustig; P A Boyd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.

Authors:  G G Rhoads; L G Jackson; S E Schlesselman; F F de la Cruz; R J Desnick; M S Golbus; D H Ledbetter; H A Lubs; M J Mahoney; E Pergament
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Preventing the birth of infants with Down's syndrome: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  S Hagard; F A Carter
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-03-27
View more
  6 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  A Lippman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Bioterrorism "preparedness": dual use or poor excuse?

Authors:  H W Cohen; R M Gould; V W Sidel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.

Authors:  A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Advances in medical technology and creation of disparities: the case of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Gérard Bréart; François Goffinet; Béatrice Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Maternal age-based prenatal screening for chromosomal disorders: attitudes of women and health care providers toward changes.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Andrea Rideout; Brenda J Wilson; Judith Allanson; Sean Blaine; Mary Jane Esplen; Sandra Farrell; Gail E Graham; Jennifer MacKenzie; Wendy S Meschino; Preeti Prakash; Cheryl Shuman; Sherry Taylor; Stasey Tobin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Comparison of different strategies in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: cost effectiveness analysis of computer simulation.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Geneviève Gagné; Emmanuel Bujold; Daniel Douillard; Jean-Claude Forest; Daniel Reinharz; François Rousseau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.