Literature DB >> 7510852

Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening.

J E Haddow1, G E Palomaki, G J Knight, G C Cunningham, L S Lustig, P A Boyd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As maternal age advances, the risk of fetal Down's syndrome increases. Pregnant women 35 years of age or older are routinely offered amniocentesis because of this risk. Recently, maternal serum markers have been reported to be useful in screening for Down's syndrome, primarily in younger women. We therefore investigated whether offering amniocentesis only to selected women 35 years of age or older who were identified by screening measurements in serum might prove a useful alternative to the current practice.
METHODS: We studied 5385 women with singleton pregnancies who were 35 years of age or older and were undergoing routine amniocentesis. Along with information about the pregnancy, we obtained a serum sample for measurement of alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol, and human chorionic gonadotropin. Individual estimates of the risk of Down's syndrome in the fetus were calculated for each pregnancy before the karyotype was known.
RESULTS: If amniocentesis had been reserved for the women calculated to have a risk greater than 1 in 200 of having a fetus with Down's syndrome, 48 of the 54 cases of Down's syndrome (89 percent) would have been identified, 25 percent of the unaffected pregnancies would also have been identified as being at high risk for Down's syndrome (false positives). Seven of 15 fetuses (47 percent) with other trisomies, 11 of 25 (44 percent) with sex aneuploidy, and 1 of 9 (11 percent) with miscellaneous chromosomal abnormalities would also have been detected. In practice, such screening would have made 75 percent of the amniocentesis unnecessary, along with a proportion of the amniocentesis-associated fetal losses. If the cutoff for the risk of Down's syndrome were set higher than 1 in 200, both the rate of detection and the false positive rate would be lower. Conversely, these rates would be higher if the cutoff were set lower.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal screening of serum to generate individual estimates of the risk of Down's syndrome in the fetus can provide a basis for decision making in the cases of women 35 years of age or older, as it does in younger pregnant women, and is an alternative to current testing practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7510852     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199404213301603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  15 in total

1.  Attitudes toward maternal serum screening in Chinese women with positive results.

Authors:  Sheau-Wen Jan; Chih-Ping Chen; Lian-Hua Huang; Fu-Yuan Huang; Chung-Chi Lan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Janine Goujard; François Goffinet
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Trade-offs in prenatal detection of Down syndrome.

Authors:  M Serra-Prat; P Gallo; A J Jovell; M Aymerich; M D Estrada
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Strategies for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J P Wyllie; R J Madar; M Wright; J Burn; C Wren
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Update and Review: Maternal Serum Screening.

Authors:  K E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  New discoveries on the biology and detection of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Authors:  Laurence A Cole
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Role of nucleolar protein NOM1 in pancreatic islet β cell apoptosis in diabetes.

Authors:  Leilei Yu; Huifeng Wang; Zhongxiu Guo; Fenghua Li; Hong Cui
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 8.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

9.  Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Sherri Pena; Judith T Bishop; Sanae Nakagawa; Steven E Gregorich; Anita Sit; Juan Vargas; Aaron B Caughey; Susan Sykes; Lasha Pierce; Mary E Norton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  P T Dick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.