Literature DB >> 9935085

Comparison of the Q-switched alexandrite, Nd:YAG, and ruby lasers in treating blue-black tattoos.

M L Leuenberger1, M W Mulas, T R Hata, M P Goldman, R E Fitzpatrick, J M Grevelink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new generation of highly selective short-pulsed lasers has emerged in recent years for the treatment of tattoos. Several studies (including reports by the present investigators) have proven the efficacy of each of the three commercially available, FDA approved devices; namely, the Q-switched alexandrite, Q-switched Nd:YAG and Q-switched ruby lasers. Considerable differences among the three have been reported in relation to the rate of clearing of the tattoo ink particles, tissue effects, beam profile, wound healing, and side effects.
OBJECTIVE: This study was primarily conducted to examine and compare the clinical response of patients with blue-black tattoos simultaneously treated with three different Q-switched lasers (alexandrite, Nd:YAG, ruby) with a focus on the percentage of tattoo lightening/clearance and the occurrence or non-occurrence of pigmentary change as a side effect.
METHODS: A total of forty-two blue-black tattoos seen at two laser centers (Massachusetts General Hospital Dermatology Laser Center and Laser and Skin Surgery Center of La Jolla) were simultaneously treated with three types of Q-switched lasers: a Candela Q-switched alexandrite laser (755nm 50-100 nanoseconds, 3.0 mm spot size, 6-8 J/cm2); a Continuum Biomedical Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064nm, 10-20 nanoseconds, 3.0 mm spot size, 5-10 J/cm2); and a Spectrum Q-switched ruby laser (694 nm, 25-40 nanoseconds, 5.0 mm spot size, 4-10 J/cm2). Paired t-tests and McNemar tests were used to compare the treatment outcome and pigmentation side effects between sites per tattoo, with each site representative of one of the three lasers. The statistical significance level was set at p < .05.
RESULTS: Overall, the Q-switched ruby laser had a significant difference in tattoo lightening versus the Q-switched Nd:YAG and Q-switched alexandrite lasers. An increase in the number of treatments paralleled a statistically significant increase in tattoo clearance for all three Q-switched lasers.
CONCLUSION: The Q-switched ruby laser had the highest clearance rate in blue-black tattoos and the highest incidence of long-lasting hypopigmentation. The Nd:YAG had no incidence of hypopigmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9935085     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08122.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  14 in total

Review 1.  Lasers for tattoo removal: a review.

Authors:  Sonal Choudhary; Mohamed L Elsaie; Angel Leiva; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Laser tattoo removal.

Authors:  Eric F Bernstein
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Dermatologic Laser Side Effects and Complications: Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Tina S Alster; Monica K Li
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 4.  Laser assisted tattoo removal - state of the art and new developments.

Authors:  W Bäumler; K T Weiß
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  A novel, simple and efficacious technique for tattoo removal resulting in less pain using the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser.

Authors:  Michael J Murphy
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Iritis and pupillary distortion after periorbital cosmetic alexandrite laser.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Lin; Po-Chen Tseng; Chun-Chen Chen; Lin-Chung Woung; Shiow-Wen Liou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  An Internet-based survey on characteristics of laser tattoo removal and associated side effects.

Authors:  Annette Klein; Ines Rittmann; Karl-Anton Hiller; Michael Landthaler; Wolfgang Bäumler
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 8.  Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ofer Reiter; Lihi Atzmony; Lehavit Akerman; Assi Levi; Ruben Kershenovich; Moshe Lapidoth; Daniel Mimouni
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Optimising laser tattoo removal.

Authors:  Kabir Sardana; Rashmi Ranjan; Sneha Ghunawat
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

10.  Laser tattoo removal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Stephanie Gy Ho; Chee Leok Goh
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.