Literature DB >> 27311768

Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review.

Ofer Reiter1, Lihi Atzmony2, Lehavit Akerman2, Assi Levi2, Ruben Kershenovich2, Moshe Lapidoth2,3, Daniel Mimouni2,3.   

Abstract

Given that the pigment particles in tattoos have a relaxation time of <10 ns, picosecond lasers would be expected to be more effective than nanosecond lasers in tattoo removal. To systematically review the evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of picosecond lasers for tattoo removal, Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists were searched for relevant trials. The primary outcome was >70 % clearance of tattoo pigment. Secondary outcomes were 90-100 % clearance of tattoo pigment, number of laser sessions required, and adverse effects. Eight trials were included, six with human participants (160 participants) and 2 with animal models. Seven of the eight trials explored the usage of either 755, 758, 795, 1064, or 1064/532-nm picosecond lasers for black and blue ink tattoos. In the human trials, 69-100 % of tattoos showed over 70 % clearance of pigment after 1-10 laser treatments. Reported side effects included pain, hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation, blister formation and transient erythema, edema, and pinpoint bleeding. Included articles varied in type of laser investigated, mostly non-comparative studies and with a medium to high risk of bias. There is sparse evidence that picosecond lasers are more effective than their nanosecond counterparts for mainly black and blue ink tattoo removal, with minor side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1064 nm; 532 nm; 755 nm; 758 nm; 795 nm; Laser; Laser treatment; Nd-YAG; Tattoo; Tattoo removal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27311768     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-2001-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  28 in total

1.  Latest innovations for tattoo and permanent makeup removal.

Authors:  Johnny C Mao; Louis M DeJoseph
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.918

2.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Tattoo inks in general usage contain nanoparticles.

Authors:  T Høgsberg; K Loeschner; D Löf; J Serup
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Long-term evaluation of ink clearance in tattoos with different color intensity using the 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser.

Authors:  Agata Mankowska; Wojciech Kasprzak; Zygmunt Adamski
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Successful and rapid treatment of blue and green tattoo pigment with a novel picosecond laser.

Authors:  Jeremy A Brauer; Kavitha K Reddy; Robert Anolik; Elliot T Weiss; Julie K Karen; Elizabeth K Hale; Lori A Brightman; Leonard Bernstein; Roy G Geronemus
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2012-07

6.  Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.

Authors:  V Ross; G Naseef; G Lin; M Kelly; N Michaud; T J Flotte; J Raythen; R R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1998-02

7.  The chemical removal of tattoos.

Authors:  R W Scutt
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1972-04

Review 8.  Psychodynamic implications of tattoos.

Authors:  G W Grumet
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1983-07

9.  Analysis of incidence of bulla formation after tattoo treatment using the combination of the picosecond Alexandrite laser and fractionated CO2 ablation.

Authors:  Sonoa Au; Ana M Liolios; Mitchel P Goldman
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.398

10.  Optimising laser tattoo removal.

Authors:  Kabir Sardana; Rashmi Ranjan; Sneha Ghunawat
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more
  4 in total

1.  Applications of picosecond lasers beyond tattoos: pigment reduction and tissue remodeling.

Authors:  Emily Forbat; Faisal R Ali; Firas Al-Niaimi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Laser assisted tattoo removal - state of the art and new developments.

Authors:  W Bäumler; K T Weiß
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Visualization of laser tattoo removal treatment effects in a mouse model by two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Jang; Yeoreum Yoon; Wonjoong Kim; Soonjae Kwon; Seunghun Lee; Duke Song; Jong Woon Choi; Ki Hean Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Picosecond 532-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser-a promising modality for the management of verrucous epidermal nevi.

Authors:  Assi Levi; Dan Ben Amitai; Daniel Mimouni; Yael A Leshem; Ofir Arzi; Moshe Lapidoth
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.161

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.