Literature DB >> 20567669

Laser tattoo removal.

Eric F Bernstein1.   

Abstract

Tattooing has been a part of human culture since the earliest beginnings of modern civilization. What has changed over the millennia are the myriad of colors with which we can now express our thoughts, feelings, and desires through body art. What has not changed is human nature, and our propensity to change our minds about what it is we think, feel, and wish to express on the canvas of our skin. Our fickle nature results in the desire to change what has been placed as a permanent reminder of a friend, spouse, or as a work of art. The technology used to remove tattoos began with destructive methods of removal, which wreaked havoc not only on the tattoo but more prominently on the skin containing that tattoo. The discovery of selective photothermolysis, the ability to selectively remove target structures without disrupting the surrounding skin, made it at least possible to remove tattoos without destroying the surrounding skin and leaving a scar. Theory predicted that pulse durations in the nanosecond domain would be optimal for tattoo removal, and the Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet, alexandrite, and ruby lasers operate in this range and are the key tools for modern tattoo removal. Too often, the wrong devices operating in the millisecond range, such as intense pulsed light sources, or lasers that are nonselective, such as the carbon dioxide laser, are used to treat tattoos, resulting in significant scarring without complete removal of the tattoo. Although the Q-switched lasers are capable of removing tattoos without harming the skin, removal often takes numerous treatments and still can be incomplete, especially when attempting to remove multicolored tattoos. Developments leading to removable tattoo inks, feedback systems to detect the absorbance characteristics of tattoo inks, dermal clearing agents, and perhaps even shorter pulse-duration lasers should result in improvements in tattoo removal in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser; Nd:YAG; Q-switched; alexandrite; pigment; ruby; skin; tattoo

Year:  2007        PMID: 20567669      PMCID: PMC2884836          DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-991186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  61 in total

1.  Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.

Authors:  V Ross; G Naseef; G Lin; M Kelly; N Michaud; T J Flotte; J Raythen; R R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1998-02

2.  An effective cosmetic treatment for Ota's nevus.

Authors:  B Cosman; D B Apfelberg; D Druker
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  The chemical removal of tattoos.

Authors:  R W Scutt
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1972-04

Review 4.  The removal of digital tattoos.

Authors:  G B Colver; R P Dawber
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.736

5.  Q-switched alexandrite laser treatment (755 nm) of professional and amateur tattoos.

Authors:  T S Alster
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  The ruby and argon lasers in the treatment of naevi.

Authors:  T Ohshiro; Y Maruyama
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.473

7.  Tattoo removal using infra-red coagulation.

Authors:  G B Colver; G W Cherry; R P Dawber; T J Ryan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Salabrasion of tattoos. A correlation of the clinical and histological results.

Authors:  W A Koerber; N M Price
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1978-06

9.  Comparison of the infrared coagulator and the carbon dioxide laser in the removal of decorative tattoos.

Authors:  D W Groot; J P Arlette; P A Johnston
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Monoline argon laser (514 nm) treatment of benign pigmented lesions with long pulse lengths.

Authors:  M A Trelles; W Verkruysse; J W Pickering; M Vélez; J Sánchez; P Sala
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.252

View more
  6 in total

1.  Complications of Tattoos and Tattoo Removal: Stop and Think Before you ink.

Authors:  Niti Khunger; Anupama Molpariya; Arjun Khunger
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

2.  At the dark end of the rainbow: data gaps in tattoo toxicology.

Authors:  Ines Schreiver; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Formation of highly toxic hydrogen cyanide upon ruby laser irradiation of the tattoo pigment phthalocyanine blue.

Authors:  Ines Schreiver; Christoph Hutzler; Peter Laux; Hans-Peter Berlien; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Efficacy of the Q-switched Neodymium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in the Treatment of Blue-black Amateur and Professional Tattoos.

Authors:  Chembolli Lakshmi; Gayathri Krishnaswamy
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Tattoos on 18-year-old male adolescents--characteristics and associated factors.

Authors:  José Froner Bicca; Rodrigo Pereira Duquia; Juliano de Avelar Breunig; Paulo Ricardo Martins de Souza; Hiram Larangeira de Almeida
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

6.  Application of silver sulfadiazine cream with early surgical intervention in patients suffering from combined burn-blast injury facial tattoos.

Authors:  Ali Ebrahimi; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2012-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.