Literature DB >> 9934818

Rapid screening test evaluation for microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus.

I Fernández Fernández1, J M Páez Pinto, T Hermosín Bono, P Vázquez Garijo, M A Ortiz Camuñez, M A Tarilonte Delgado.   

Abstract

Microalbuminuria predicts clinical nephropathy and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. This study was undertaken to evaluate a screening microalbuminuria test with the Micral test II dipstick in a general practice setting and compare whether, if three urine samples are tested, any advantage is offered over a testing single sample. Two hundred and eighty diabetic patients attending a primary health care centre were studied. The first morning urine albumin concentration was determined by dipstick over 3 consecutive days. We studied two valuation methods: Method 1. Three-sample method: the test was considered positive if albumin was equal to or above 20 mg/l in at least two of three tests; Method 2. Single-sample method: we selected the third test, i.e. the most recent urine sample; if albumin was equal to or above 20 mg/l it was considered positive. The gold standard was the albumin excretion rate measured by a nephelometric method in a 24-h urine collection. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and Kappa coefficient were calculated. The diagnostic performance was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic curve. Microalbuminuria was defined for different thresholds of albumin excretion rate, 15, 20, 25 and 30 microg/min: their frequency was 38, 29, 23 and 18%, respectively. For method 1, the sensitivity of Micral test II oscillated between 70-94% and the specificity between 93-83%. For method 2, the sensitivity oscillated between 64-86%, and the specificity between 88-80%. Both methods had a high diagnostic performance. The Kappa coefficient was 84 and 60% for method 1 and 2, respectively. The Micral test II is a rapid, valid and reliable method for microalbuminuria screening in diabetic patients. It constitutes an important tool for diabetic surveillance in general practice. Although the use of three samples provides better results, the use of a single sample produces acceptable results at a low cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9934818     DOI: 10.1007/s005920050131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol        ISSN: 0940-5429            Impact factor:   4.280


  4 in total

1.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Renal and cardiovascular risk predictive value of two different microalbuminuria screening methods in patients with hypertension with/without diabetes in Portugal.

Authors:  J Polónia; D Carvalho; J Nazaré; L Martins; P M da Silva; C Aguiar; M C Manso; T Carqueja
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Regression of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetics after switch to irbesartan treatment : an observational study in 38 016 patients in primary care.

Authors:  H Lehnert; P Bramlage; D Pittrow; W Kirch
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Microalbuminuria: what is it? Why is it important? What should be done about it?

Authors:  G L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.