Literature DB >> 26740337

Renal and cardiovascular risk predictive value of two different microalbuminuria screening methods in patients with hypertension with/without diabetes in Portugal.

J Polónia1, D Carvalho2, J Nazaré3, L Martins4, P M da Silva5, C Aguiar6, M C Manso7, T Carqueja8.   

Abstract

MicRoAlbuminuria sCreening survEy (RACE) was a multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study conducted in primary health-care settings of Portugal. Here, we present a post-hoc analysis from the RACE study, assessing the renal and cardiovascular (CV) risk predictive value of two different microalbuminuria (MA) screening methods, nephelometry with 24-h urine (MA-24 h) and Micral test with occasional urine (MicralA) in patients with hypertension (HTN) with/without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Out of 3065 patients, 1173 (38.3%) were in the HTN group without T2DM (HTN) and 1892 (61.7%) in the HTN group with T2DM (HTN+T2DM). The overall prevalence of MA was 50.6% determined by MicralA and 22.1% with MA-24 h. Urinary albumin excretion data obtained by both techniques correlated significantly (rs=0.586; P<0.001). In all subjects, MicralA showed a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 62% for detection of MA, with a positive predictive value of 41% and negative predictive value of 97%. With both methods, the presence of MA was independently associated with a higher risk (1.5- to 2.9-fold) of CV and renal organ damage in both HTN and HTN+T2DM groups. MicralA, due to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value, can be considered as a valid and reliable method for MA screening in patients with HTN with/without T2DM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26740337     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2015.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  24 in total

1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Multicenter evaluation of the Micral-Test II test strip, an immunologic rapid test for the detection of microalbuminuria.

Authors:  C E Mogensen; G C Viberti; E Peheim; D Kutter; C Hasslacher; W Hofmann; R Renner; M Bojestig; P L Poulsen; G Scott; J Thoma; J Kuefer; B Nilsson; B Gambke; P Mueller; J Steinbiss; K D Willamowski
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Albuminuria: when urine predicts kidney and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Reejis Stephen; Stacey E Jolly; Joseph V Nally; Sankar D Navaneethan
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for microalbuminuria in a referred cohort of type II diabetic patients: a global perspective.

Authors:  H-H Parving; J B Lewis; M Ravid; G Remuzzi; L G Hunsicker
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for microalbuminuria using immunochemical dipstick tests or laboratory assays in diabetic patients.

Authors:  J P Le Floch; M A Charles; C Philippon; L Perlemuter
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Assessment of a new dipstick test in screening for microalbuminuria in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  L M Gerber; K Johnston; M H Alderman
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  The use of the Micral-Test strip to identify the presence of microalbuminuria in people with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) participating in the EUCLID study.

Authors:  D J Webb; D J Newman; N Chaturvedi; J H Fuller
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.602

8.  Diagnostic significance of transferrinuria and albumin-specific dipstick testing in primary care patients with elevated office blood pressure.

Authors:  A Zeller; T Haehner; E Battegay; B Martina
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Prevalence of microalbuminuria in non-diabetic hypertensive patients attended by Portuguese GPs.

Authors:  Jorge Polónia; Jose Carmona; Eduardo Mendes; Luís Pisco
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.374

Review 10.  Comparison of commonly used assays for the detection of microalbuminuria.

Authors:  Douglas E Busby; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.