Literature DB >> 9934385

Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web.

M A Graber1, C M Roller, B Kaeble.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient education is an important component of family practice. Pamphlets, verbal instructions, and physicians' self-created materials have been the most common resources for patient education. Today, however, the popularity of the World Wide Web (Web) as a ready source of educational materials is increasing. The reading skills required by a patient to understand that information has not been determined. The objective of our study was to assess the readability of medical information on the Web that is specifically intended for patients.
METHODS: An investigator downloaded 50 sequential samples of patient education material from the Web. This information was then evaluated for readability using the Flesch reading score and Flesch-Kinkaid reading level.
RESULTS: On average, the patient information from the Web in our sample is written at a 10th grade, 2nd month reading level. Previous studies have shown that this readability level is not comprehensible to the majority of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Much of the medical information targeted for the general public on the Web is written at a reading level higher than is easily understood by much of the patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9934385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  37 in total

Review 1.  Medical information and the Internet: do you know what you are getting?

Authors:  Fitzgerald Craan; Denise M Oleske
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A situational approach to the design of a patient-oriented disease-specific knowledge base.

Authors:  Matthew I Kim; Paul Ladenson; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  In their own words? A terminological analysis of e-mail to a cancer information service.

Authors:  Catherine Arnott Smith; P Zoë Stavri; Wendy Webber Chapman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Promoting health literacy.

Authors:  Alexa T McCray
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A survey of kidney disease and risk-factor information on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  José Luis Calderón; Ashraf Zadshir; Keith Norris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-11-11

6.  Clinical Digital Libraries Project: design approach and exploratory assessment of timely use in clinical environments.

Authors:  Steven L Maccall
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-04

7.  Variation in the readability of items within surveys.

Authors:  José L Calderón; Leo S Morales; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Darren R Hargrave; Ursula A Hargrave; Eric Bouffet
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Sameer Badarudeen; Shebna Unes Kunju
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  The internet's role in HPV vaccine education.

Authors:  Pooja R Patel; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.