Literature DB >> 15775830

A survey of kidney disease and risk-factor information on the World Wide Web.

José Luis Calderón1, Ashraf Zadshir, Keith Norris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is epidemic, and informing those at risk is a national health priority. However, the discrepancy between the readability of health information and the literacy skills of those it targets is a recognized barrier to communicating health information that may promote good health outcomes. Because the World Wide Web has become one of the most important sources of health information, we sought to assess the readability of commonly available CKD information.
METHODS: Twelve highly cited English-language, kidney disease Web sites were identified with 4 popular search engines. Each Web site was reviewed for the availability of 6 domains of information germane to CKD and risk-factor information. We estimated readability scores with the Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch Reading Ease Index methods. The deviation of readability scores for CKD information from readability appropriate to average literacy skills and the limited literacy skills of vulnerable populations (low socioeconomic status, health disparities, and elderly) were calculated.
RESULTS: Eleven Web sites met the inclusion criteria. Six of 11 sites provided information on all 6 domains of CKD and risk-factor information. Mean readability scores for all 6 domains of CKD information exceeded national average literacy skills and far exceeded the fifth-grade-level readability desired for informing vulnerable populations. Information about CKD and diabetes consistently had higher readability scores.
CONCLUSION: Information on the World Wide Web about CKD and its risk factors may not be readable for comprehension by the general public, especially by underserved minority populations with limited literacy skills. Barriers to health communication may be important contributors to the rising CKD epidemic and disparities in CKD health status experienced by minority populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15775830      PMCID: PMC1480557     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MedGenMed        ISSN: 1531-0132


  25 in total

1.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  M A Graber; C M Roller; B Kaeble
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  How reliable is computerized assessment of readability?

Authors:  S L Mailloux; M E Johnson; D G Fisher; T J Pettibone
Journal:  Comput Nurs       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

4.  Relationship of functional health literacy to patients' knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes.

Authors:  M V Williams; D W Baker; R M Parker; J R Nurss
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-26

5.  Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization.

Authors:  J A Gazmararian; D W Baker; M V Williams; R M Parker; T L Scott; D C Green; S N Fehrenbach; J Ren; J P Koplan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals.

Authors:  M V Williams; R M Parker; D W Baker; N S Parikh; K Pitkin; W C Coates; J R Nurss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The accessibility of computer-based health information for patients: kiosks and the web.

Authors:  R B Jones; F Balfour; M Gillies; D Stobo; A J Cawsey; K Donaldson
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

9.  Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission.

Authors:  D W Baker; R M Parker; M V Williams; W S Clark
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills.

Authors:  R M Parker; D W Baker; M V Williams; J R Nurss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Health literacy: emerging evidence and applications in kidney disease care.

Authors:  Leigh Anne Dageforde; Kerri L Cavanaugh
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.620

2.  Readability and Comprehension of the Geriatric Depression Scale and PROMIS® Physical Function Items in Older African Americans and Latinos.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Loretta Jones; José L Calderón; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Socioeconomic disparities in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Susanne B Nicholas; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Keith C Norris
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.620

4.  Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Honghu Liu; Marie N Fongwa; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Kidney Disease Among African Americans: A Population Perspective.

Authors:  Marciana Laster; Jenny I Shen; Keith C Norris
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 6.  Perspective: Protein Requirements and Optimal Intakes in Aging: Are We Ready to Recommend More Than the Recommended Daily Allowance?

Authors:  Daniel A Traylor; Stefan H M Gorissen; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  Changes in Kidney Function Do Not Differ between Healthy Adults Consuming Higher- Compared with Lower- or Normal-Protein Diets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michaela C Devries; Arjun Sithamparapillai; K Scott Brimble; Laura Banfield; Robert W Morton; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Dietary protein intake and renal function.

Authors:  William F Martin; Lawrence E Armstrong; Nancy R Rodriguez
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.169

9.  Interest in the use of computerized patient portals: role of the provider-patient relationship.

Authors:  Susan L Zickmund; Rachel Hess; Cindy L Bryce; Kathleen McTigue; Ellen Olshansky; Katharine Fitzgerald; Gary S Fischer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.